Loading Loading
Just for optimization

Politics.comforum

freecreditcheck.com |  creditreports.com |  whois.domaintools.com |  bookclub.com

Could we survive wothout trade?

Could we survive wothout trade?

 

DrWord Member Since: Mar 20th, 2009 - Debate started 12 months ago

Trade is so overrated, what's wrong with using only what you have. Trade costs us alot- stores, transportation, distribution etc. Economics is supposed to be all about oppurtunity costs, well the opportunity cost of trade isn't really worth it.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

38 Posts New Post

Sorry

or Register to reply.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 12 months ago

This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 12 months ago

Property is inheretly theft. Property applies to what is Not you and what is NOT mine especially with the top 1% of the world owning 80% of the world's wealth in a "Cash" monetary form....

what entitles anyone person to more stuff than the next? nothing

poor people work hard, middle class work hard, rich people work hard

poor people don't work hard, middle class people don't work hard, rich people don't work hard

many poor people don't work, many middle class don't work, many rich don't work

what entitles a poor person that works to a higher lifestyle than the poor person that doesn't work? NOTHING

No one knows why a poor person doesn't work...there are many reasons - could be welfare, could be they are too sick

No one knows why a rich person doesn't work....there are many reasons - could be inheretence, could be cause they just choose not to.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 12 months ago

Response to Rosetteismyname
Property is inheretly theft. Property applies to what is Not you and what is NOT mine especially wit … Show full post

This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months ago

Trade allows us to specialize in just one thing, actually making the world much more efficient....

"What is wrong with using only what you have?" Unless you're good at farming and you own several acres of land that are perfect for growing a balanced diet of foods, you'll starve to death. That's what is wrong with it.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 12 months ago

Response to scottkirk
Trade allows us to specialize in just one thing, actually making the world much more efficient.... … Show full post

Trade allows to specialize, making the world more effecient, i agree, but trade also wastes resources on stores, distribution, transportation, storage etc and it leads to competition which in turn leads to a gap between rich and poor among others. And economics is all about oppurtunity costs, now is efficiency really worth all that i don't think so.

Note: A waste of resources on the above mentioned reduces the efficiency of trade.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months ago

Response to DrWord
Trade allows to specialize, making the world more effecient, i agree, but trade also wastes resource … Show full post

So you're suggesting then, not that we get rid of trade, but to go back to a direct barter system? Where we have to spend all of our free time searching for those who posses the goods that we need?

Wouldn't it be much more efficient to create a marketplace where we can more easily find our goods? Perhaps we could call that marketplace WalMart? And we could pay the organizer of WalMart a small markup for the convenience of shopping in one place! Then we'd have more free time to produce our own good... making us more efficient.

I'm not even sure how to address your comment on how competition leads to a gap between the rich and poor... that doesn't even make sense! Have you ever studied Econ 101?

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 12 months ago

Response to scottkirk
So you're suggesting then, not that we get rid of trade, but to go back to a direct barter system? W … Show full post

Need or want? We need food, shelter, housing and clothing, all can be gotten by farming.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months ago

Response to DrWord
Need or want? We need food, shelter, housing and clothing, all can be gotten by farming.

Even the poorest people today in our country are better off than most farmers 200 years ago. Even most Native Americans refuse to hunt & gather, and sleep in tepees anymore. Have you ever tried to grow a garden? It is a lot of work. I'd much rather flip burgers than be a farmer. You really need to think about what you're saying!

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

FreedomGirl 12 months ago

Lets go back to the economic theory of comparative advantage with talks about ability of a person / country to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost then the others.Comparative advantage explains why trade creates value for both parties engaged in trade.

Today, we trade things that we choose to let being produced by others. In the ancient times the trade was based on obtaining materials that were not produced in the region – examples are copper, and other metals. Trade also goes into the concept of specialization of labor – when you can buy things cheaply from others – it’s a good idea.

Trade in ancient times was promoting the geographical discovery. Take examples of spice trade which started the Age of exploration leading to the discovery of America. Silk route is another example in this case.

Are you proposing to go to bartering system or natural production?

I see that you live in Brooklyn – do you think you can survive there without trade?

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 12 months ago

Response to scottkirk
Even the poorest people today in our country are better off than most farmers 200 years ago. Even mo … Show full post

This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 12 months ago

Response to FreedomGirl
Lets go back to the economic theory of comparative advantage with talks about ability of a person / … Show full post

Since you brought up opportunity costs how about we look at the opportunity cost of trade, sure we gain a few more than without but look at the price we pay for it- waste of resources on distrubution, transportation, storage etc and without trade there would be no monetary value, hence, there will be no rich or poor.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months ago

Response to DrWord
This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of UseShow full post

You need to log off your computer and get to work then. The amish might welcome you into their society if you're nice.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 12 months ago

Response to scottkirk
You need to log off your computer and get to work then. The amish might welcome you into their soci … Show full post

This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months ago

Response to DrWord
This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of UseShow full post

If you're running your own farm and living off of what you grow then why wouldn't you be able to survive? (Other than the fact that you're probably too lazy to actually succeed at it.) "Monetary value" is simply a means for exchange. You are always free to not trade or barter without money.

You really just don't get it. Go take econ 101 and then consider sharing your views when you have at least a slight clue of what you're talking about.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 12 months ago

Response to DrWord
This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of UseShow full post

re-read it and respond with something substantive.

I was clear...

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DarylWashington (Republican) - 12 months ago

Response to Rosetteismyname
re-read it and respond with something substantive. I was clear... Show full post

Yes we can survive without trade. This reminds me of my post I created. The one year economic plan for America" I think we must stop trading and most relief for about one year. We need to put that back into our economy and let Americans prosper again. I will keep up with the economic debate, among other things.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

sipraomer 10 months ago

We can survive without trade but we can't live a life of 300 years ago. In todays industrialized world one country doesn't have all the resources to meet the requirement for developing a certain products. For instance take Computers. USA is the largest oil consuming country. If she stops importing oil how can she make computers. How will you be able to view or participate in this blog even. Will you be happy in living a village life. A slow and less attractive life. In this case trade is necessary to enjoy the pleasures of life. As far as gap between poor and rich is concerned. I believe that a little freedom will have to be sacrificed. First of all people will have to be limitized in their earning. For instance a person could not have more than one factory if he is an industrialist. Every citizen should not have more than one home. All of the homes should look alike from outside and should be of the same size. Thus by reducing the difference between rich and poor's lifestyle as much as possible.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 10 months ago

Response to scottkirk
If you're running your own farm and living off of what you grow then why wouldn't you be able to sur … Show full post

This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 10 months ago

Response to sipraomer
We can survive without trade but we can't live a life of 300 years ago. In todays industrialized wor … Show full post

if we were survivng without trade why would we need computers or any other products as such.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

sipraomer 10 months ago

Response to DrWord
if we were survivng without trade why would we need computers or any other products as such.

That is the thing which you are not understanding. Merely surviving is not important. Living a comfortable life is. I agree to your point to an extent that there should be balance between luxury and healthy life which could be attained with hardships. Means Not so luxurious but still reasonable. But as far as going to the stone age. Mark my words that you will be the first to run from the hard life which you are advocating.

For the sake of arguments we would need computers even if we were surviving on farming because we still had to communicate with each other and solve other problems in that life even. Communication is still necessary. Now don't tell me on the next post that people of this age will be patient for letter posts and arrivals. Imagine I am living in New York and order for wheat seeds from California because New York can't produce the sufficient amount. I post a letter to Californian wheat company and they send the product in four weeks. First two weeks will be consumed in the communication process only. Hahahh. What a joke. DrWord change your user name from DrWord to Lotus 123. Atleast it is an old program which runs in DOS. Or Grandpa would be better. No offense just kidding. By the way what point you wanna make? Aren't you getting my point?

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 10 months ago

Response to sipraomer
That is the thing which you are not understanding. Merely surviving is not important. Living a comfo … Show full post

hate to break it to you but i don't think i'll be running from anything, as a matter of fact i've experienced a little of it.

and life is survival, living a comfortable life is an excuse for people to get lazier and lazier until computers are doing everything for us.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

sipraomer 9 months ago

Response to DrWord
hate to break it to you but i don't think i'll be running from anything, as a matter of fact i've ex … Show full post

Computers should not do everything for us. But Computers should do somethings for us. We shouldn't be lazy to depend on machines totally. But we can't live without machines completely even. If we won't build tanks and use horses as cavalry. Other countries will conquer us in nano seconds. They will eventually be a threat to our survival. The very same survival you are talking about.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 9 months ago

Response to sipraomer
Computers should not do everything for us. But Computers should do somethings for us. We shouldn't b … Show full post

Actually, we can live without computers and we can live without trade and honestly in my opinion living without trade is better off.

if we didn't build..., other countries won't, i am talking about everyone in general.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

sipraomer 9 months ago

Response to DrWord
Actually, we can live without computers and we can live without trade and honestly in my opinion liv … Show full post

Every one doesn't have the same thinking. If everyone would have the same thinking as you want it to be. Then there would have been no countries. No separate identities. No separate cultures. No religous, social or regional differences. No evil and no Good. This thinking of yours is totally illogical and impractical. We are not living in an Ideal world. We are living in a world where we can make choices up to some extent.. Our aims and objectives are also according to our resources. Why won't other countries? Why not? Do you say only the American people want to conquer? You are mistaken. Every one wants to rule. You are not every one. So it is good to think about a fantasy world to run away from the hassle of today's life. But in this process you will gain nothing and only lie with yourself. When you give an arguement you should also state a fact supporting it. Just saying a thing doesn't make it that way.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

DrWord 9 months ago

Response to sipraomer
Every one doesn't have the same thinking. If everyone would have the same thinking as you want it to … Show full post

i simply asked if everyone could survive without trade.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

1 - 25 / 37
Previous 1 2 Next
38 Posts New Post