Loading
DrWord 12 months agoThis post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use. Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 12 months agoProperty is inheretly theft. Property applies to what is Not you and what is NOT mine especially with the top 1% of the world owning 80% of the world's wealth in a "Cash" monetary form.... DrWord 12 months ago
Response to Rosetteismyname
Property is inheretly theft. Property applies to what is Not you and what is NOT mine especially wit … Show full post This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use. scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months agoTrade allows us to specialize in just one thing, actually making the world much more efficient.... DrWord 12 months ago
Response to scottkirk
Trade allows us to specialize in just one thing, actually making the world much more efficient.... … Show full post Trade allows to specialize, making the world more effecient, i agree, but trade also wastes resources on stores, distribution, transportation, storage etc and it leads to competition which in turn leads to a gap between rich and poor among others. And economics is all about oppurtunity costs, now is efficiency really worth all that i don't think so. scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months ago
Response to DrWord
Trade allows to specialize, making the world more effecient, i agree, but trade also wastes resource … Show full post So you're suggesting then, not that we get rid of trade, but to go back to a direct barter system? Where we have to spend all of our free time searching for those who posses the goods that we need? DrWord 12 months ago
Response to scottkirk
So you're suggesting then, not that we get rid of trade, but to go back to a direct barter system? W … Show full post Need or want? We need food, shelter, housing and clothing, all can be gotten by farming. scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months ago
Response to DrWord
Need or want? We need food, shelter, housing and clothing, all can be gotten by farming. Even the poorest people today in our country are better off than most farmers 200 years ago. Even most Native Americans refuse to hunt & gather, and sleep in tepees anymore. Have you ever tried to grow a garden? It is a lot of work. I'd much rather flip burgers than be a farmer. You really need to think about what you're saying! FreedomGirl 12 months agoLets go back to the economic theory of comparative advantage with talks about ability of a person / country to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost then the others.Comparative advantage explains why trade creates value for both parties engaged in trade. DrWord 12 months ago
Response to scottkirk
Even the poorest people today in our country are better off than most farmers 200 years ago. Even mo … Show full post This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use. DrWord 12 months ago
Response to FreedomGirl
Lets go back to the economic theory of comparative advantage with talks about ability of a person / … Show full post Since you brought up opportunity costs how about we look at the opportunity cost of trade, sure we gain a few more than without but look at the price we pay for it- waste of resources on distrubution, transportation, storage etc and without trade there would be no monetary value, hence, there will be no rich or poor. scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months ago
Response to DrWord
This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use … Show full post You need to log off your computer and get to work then. The amish might welcome you into their society if you're nice. DrWord 12 months ago
Response to scottkirk
You need to log off your computer and get to work then. The amish might welcome you into their soci … Show full post This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use. scottkirk (Libertarian) - 12 months ago
Response to DrWord
This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use … Show full post If you're running your own farm and living off of what you grow then why wouldn't you be able to survive? (Other than the fact that you're probably too lazy to actually succeed at it.) "Monetary value" is simply a means for exchange. You are always free to not trade or barter without money. Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 12 months ago
Response to DrWord
This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use … Show full post re-read it and respond with something substantive. DarylWashington (Republican) - 12 months ago
Response to Rosetteismyname
re-read it and respond with something substantive. I was clear... Show full post Yes we can survive without trade. This reminds me of my post I created. The one year economic plan for America" I think we must stop trading and most relief for about one year. We need to put that back into our economy and let Americans prosper again. I will keep up with the economic debate, among other things. sipraomer 10 months agoWe can survive without trade but we can't live a life of 300 years ago. In todays industrialized world one country doesn't have all the resources to meet the requirement for developing a certain products. For instance take Computers. USA is the largest oil consuming country. If she stops importing oil how can she make computers. How will you be able to view or participate in this blog even. Will you be happy in living a village life. A slow and less attractive life. In this case trade is necessary to enjoy the pleasures of life. As far as gap between poor and rich is concerned. I believe that a little freedom will have to be sacrificed. First of all people will have to be limitized in their earning. For instance a person could not have more than one factory if he is an industrialist. Every citizen should not have more than one home. All of the homes should look alike from outside and should be of the same size. Thus by reducing the difference between rich and poor's lifestyle as much as possible. DrWord 10 months ago
Response to scottkirk
If you're running your own farm and living off of what you grow then why wouldn't you be able to sur … Show full post This post has been removed in accordance with our Terms of Use. DrWord 10 months ago
Response to sipraomer
We can survive without trade but we can't live a life of 300 years ago. In todays industrialized wor … Show full post if we were survivng without trade why would we need computers or any other products as such. sipraomer 10 months ago
Response to DrWord
if we were survivng without trade why would we need computers or any other products as such. That is the thing which you are not understanding. Merely surviving is not important. Living a comfortable life is. I agree to your point to an extent that there should be balance between luxury and healthy life which could be attained with hardships. Means Not so luxurious but still reasonable. But as far as going to the stone age. Mark my words that you will be the first to run from the hard life which you are advocating. DrWord 10 months ago
Response to sipraomer
That is the thing which you are not understanding. Merely surviving is not important. Living a comfo … Show full post hate to break it to you but i don't think i'll be running from anything, as a matter of fact i've experienced a little of it. sipraomer 9 months ago
Response to DrWord
hate to break it to you but i don't think i'll be running from anything, as a matter of fact i've ex … Show full post Computers should not do everything for us. But Computers should do somethings for us. We shouldn't be lazy to depend on machines totally. But we can't live without machines completely even. If we won't build tanks and use horses as cavalry. Other countries will conquer us in nano seconds. They will eventually be a threat to our survival. The very same survival you are talking about. DrWord 9 months ago
Response to sipraomer
Computers should not do everything for us. But Computers should do somethings for us. We shouldn't b … Show full post Actually, we can live without computers and we can live without trade and honestly in my opinion living without trade is better off. sipraomer 9 months ago
Response to DrWord
Actually, we can live without computers and we can live without trade and honestly in my opinion liv … Show full post Every one doesn't have the same thinking. If everyone would have the same thinking as you want it to be. Then there would have been no countries. No separate identities. No separate cultures. No religous, social or regional differences. No evil and no Good. This thinking of yours is totally illogical and impractical. We are not living in an Ideal world. We are living in a world where we can make choices up to some extent.. Our aims and objectives are also according to our resources. Why won't other countries? Why not? Do you say only the American people want to conquer? You are mistaken. Every one wants to rule. You are not every one. So it is good to think about a fantasy world to run away from the hassle of today's life. But in this process you will gain nothing and only lie with yourself. When you give an arguement you should also state a fact supporting it. Just saying a thing doesn't make it that way. DrWord 9 months ago
Response to sipraomer
Every one doesn't have the same thinking. If everyone would have the same thinking as you want it to … Show full post i simply asked if everyone could survive without trade. |
DrWord Member Since: Mar 20th, 2009 - Debate started 12 months ago
Trade is so overrated, what's wrong with using only what you have. Trade costs us alot- stores, transportation, distribution etc. Economics is supposed to be all about oppurtunity costs, well the opportunity cost of trade isn't really worth it.
Sorry
Login or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!