Loading
padokc (Republican) - 9 months agoThe following idea has been copied over the years by many scholars but it original authorship has been attributed to the writings of and lectures of Alexander Tytler a professor (1745-1813). It is interesting that so many academics have tried to "own" this idea and they so heartily agree with Tytler. (Remember America is not a democracy and that it is often called rule by majority or "mob rule".) ironhead (Libertarian) - 9 months agoI would accept nothing in exchange for my liberty. I wouldn t except all the money in the world, if I was not free to choose what to do with it. amnestymyazz 9 months agoI have often wondered what the founding fathers would say when they look at the voter turnout for recent elections. There was a time when the voting population was in line with the adult population. Nowadays we say "did you vote?" before we continue with questions along that line. Our society has become so jaded, dare I say blinded, that many don't even consider voting a necessity. The proof is in how many young persons would trade their right to vote for monetary considerations. People forget that the right to vote was THE impetus to gain our independence from GB way back in the day. Not slavery, oil, jobs, etc. The right to vote. We need to get back to basics. That means no to big government. It means no to Socialized Medicine for sure. It means using your right to vote. amnestymyazz 9 months ago
Response to padokc
The following idea has been copied over the years by many scholars but it original authorship has be … Show full post I agree. The thing that bothers me the most is at the end of the day it is the lack of foresight of the American people that has paved the way for our own demise. The current administration, as with the ones before, throws a bone out there to placate the masses (see stimulus). However each bone erodes the foundation of democracy until what you have left is something we can no longer stand on. It is our fault. countryplowboy 9 months agoGreat post. Although when you were listing quotes you forgot one that is quite fitting. "We must be ready to dare all for our country. For history does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. We must acquire proficiency in defense and display stamina in purpose. amnestymyazz 9 months agoI'm sorry. I did not answer the question. The answer is nothing. TheyreALLliars (Libertarian) - 9 months agoGreat forum! I am sure you will get a good coversation flowing. Patriot Watch (Independent) - 9 months ago
Response to amnestymyazz
I have often wondered what the founding fathers would say when they look at the voter turnout for re … Show full post agreed with everything. As far as voter turnout is concerned when the people feel there is no viable cand or that their voice does not count they dont bother FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago
Response to ironhead
I would accept nothing in exchange for my liberty. I wouldn t except all the money in the world, if … Show full post Don't totally agree with you, but that was still a fine anwser. Thank You FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago
Response to TheyreALLliars
Great forum! I am sure you will get a good coversation flowing. Benjamin Franklin thought even a … Show full post Was trying to be an equal oppertunity skeptic; I don't want George Bush to micromanage my life any more than I do Barack Obama to. Thoreau was right,"The government that governs best governs least." FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago
Response to countryplowboy
Great post. Although when you were listing quotes you forgot one that is quite fitting. "We mus … Show full post Had so many quotes I wanted to post. The following are JUST from Jefferson, the supposed founder of the modern Democrat Party: ironhead (Libertarian) - 9 months ago
Response to FREEDOMMM
Don't totally agree with you, but that was still a fine anwser. Thank You Thanks for pointing out the forum post. This is always a topic that I feel strongly about - as should everyone, IMO. Clayton9504 (Republican) - 9 months agoI would not give my liberty for anything. I would die for my liberty and will keep it that way... forever! FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago
Response to ironhead
Thanks for pointing out the forum post. This is always a topic that I feel strongly about - as shou … Show full post I totally agree that it is foolish to look to the government to solve society's problems. I disagree with your foreign policy assessments, as previously stated. Your half right on the War on Drugs and the Criminal Justice System countryplowboy 9 months ago
Response to FREEDOMMM
Had so many quotes I wanted to post. The following are JUST from Jefferson, the supposed founder of … Show full post "If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for the law. It invites every man to become a law unto himself. It invites anarchy."-U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis Good Ole Boy (Independent) - 9 months ago
Response to FREEDOMMM
Had so many quotes I wanted to post. The following are JUST from Jefferson, the supposed founder of … Show full post Jefferson must of had a crystal ball because it seems he knew what was coming. I also tend to qoute him. Those kids have no idea that people died for that right, and I blame the school system, liberals, and a society that promotes materialism. amnestymyazz 9 months ago
Response to FREEDOMMM
Had so many quotes I wanted to post. The following are JUST from Jefferson, the supposed founder of … Show full post What I find very interesting is these axioms reverberate now as loudly as they did almost 300 years ago. So many in our society want to get away from the lessons taught back then. They cite living in a different era necessitates the switch. The second amendment is just one thing always under attack. People today are no different than any peoples that have ever lived. They want the chance to live their lifes as they see fit. They want to have a say in what happens in their communities. They want to know this country will still be there for their children and their childrens children. Those kind of things do not and will not change. We may have ipods, the internet, velcro and whatever other innovations come down the pipe. At the end of the day our core wants and needs will not change. That all starts with our liberty. Bigoness-minded 9 months ago
Response to ironhead
I would accept nothing in exchange for my liberty. I wouldn t except all the money in the world, if … Show full post "If they were able to control our minds, you can be certain they would do so. "- I find it interesting that one of the first paradigms of Political Science as a field of study separate from "governmental studies," was Behavioralism. Behavioralism said that the values attitudes and beliefs, or the political culture, within a population determine political outcomes. As such, there were immense studies done to trying to figure out how to influence people's values attitudes and beliefs... Now political scientists have moved into the paradigm of the "new institutionalism" which focuses on the effect of institutional rules on people's behavior. Bigoness-minded 9 months ago
Response to Good Ole Boy
Jefferson must of had a crystal ball because it seems he knew what was coming. I also tend to qoute … Show full post agreed! material things or might I quote stephen king and say "needful things?" Jim Trebowski 9 months agoSeems to me that we traded quite a bit after the "Patriot" Act was signed. Americans were waving their flags and thanking Bush for spying on them. ironhead (Libertarian) - 9 months ago
Response to Jim Trebowski
Seems to me that we traded quite a bit after the "Patriot" Act was signed. Americans were … Show full post Absolutely correct. As I've pointed out a number of times on this site, it's very amusing how many conservatives now invoke the Constitution in protest over Obama's policies, but so many walked in lockstep with Bush as he gangfucked the rule of law again and again. Also ironic of course, are so many liberals who were so critical of Bush's policies, but are now perfectly happy when Obama has continued many of the same policies. Jim Trebowski 9 months ago
Response to ironhead
Absolutely correct. As I've pointed out a number of times on this site, it's very amusing how many … Show full post Dr. Paul? Is that you? LOL ironhead (Libertarian) - 9 months ago
Response to Jim Trebowski
Dr. Paul? Is that you? LOL I'll take that as a compliment, thank you very much. :) FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago
Response to Jim Trebowski
Seems to me that we traded quite a bit after the "Patriot" Act was signed. Americans were … Show full post You diverted a conversation about liberty being stolen today to liberty that was stolen yesterday, all because the guy who stole it yesterday was a Republican and the guy stealing today is a democrat.. The Patriot Act was in 2001, why doesn't Barry repeal it if it was so terrible? Libs are full of crap on the Patriot Act and only attacked it over partisan politics. They never cared about the flaws of the patriot act, just about inciting hatred against Bush. FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago
Response to ironhead
Absolutely correct. As I've pointed out a number of times on this site, it's very amusing how many … Show full post This is really the making of a whole new forum, but let's stipulate that the Patriot Act is fundamentally flawed. I think some of the provisions are necessary. What in particular do you, as a libertarian, find to be egregious about it? Not trying to be a smartass or anything, would like to hear detail as opposed to the same old saw ' Our freedom went out the window with the patriot act'. |
FREEDOMMM (Republican) - Member Since: Mar 20th, 2009 - Debate started 9 months ago
In late 2007, a poll was conducted among NYU students(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/6892.html ) where the question was posed, " What would you trade for your right to vote?". Some 20% of the sample would make the trade for an iPod Touch; a full two thirds, or 66% would trade it for a free ride through college; half of the group also were willing to forfeit their vote for $1 million. Hearing that made me think that somewhere our Founding Fathers were spinning in their Graves.
This is hardly new though. For decades politicians have been making promises, trying to buy the votes of their constituents. The common misconceptions people seem to have though, are that politicians either pull these things out of thin air or they get an unpopular group(the rich, smokers, foreign manufacturers, etc.) to pay for it. They don't realize that they are funding these things themselves at a much higher price than if they had bought whatever it was outright.
Forget the fact that bureaucracies are horribly inefficient for a minute and couldn't care less if your money is spent wisely; there's a much larger issue at play: What are you buying? Those same people who think they're getting something for nothing are actually paying someone to take their liberty. They are unable to put two and two together; they know they aren't as free as their parents were, but don't realize what President Gerald Ford did, "A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."
The same government that can't even manage the recently acquired financial sector or car companies without hemorrhaging money now wants to give us "Universal Healthcare Coverage."Our Congress doesn't even read the bills they vote on and has spent more money in the first few months of 2009 than every government from 1776 to 2008. THESE people want to "fix" healthcare, sort of the way the Stimulus has "fixed" the economy.
Let's pretend that Central Planning works(to go into why it doesn't is a whole other forum, think of that economic juggernaut, the Soviet Union) and that these incompetent lawyers that managed to get elected actually had a way to meet the Healthcare needs of 300 million individuals; What are we trading for this miracle cure-all? Your ability to make decisions about your own health and well being, as well as the wants and wishes of any family member you would have previously decided for. The Stimulus Bill set up a comparative effectiveness board that will make determinations of what protocol to use for given medical conditions, to insure a streamlined, one size fits all approach to the allocation of medical resources. If that sounded like rationing, they tried their damnedest to make sure it didn't.
Our founding fathers went to painstaking lengths ensure that government wouldn't be in any advantageous position to abuse it's power over the people; they put restraints on the Federal government because they didn't trust it. How would a man like Benjamin Franklin react to our giving the Federal Government the ability to determine whether we live or die? Can't be sure, but he did say this in the Poor Richard;s Almanack in 1738, "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power." How about Jefferson?"I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That "all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people." To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition." --Letter to Gen. Lafayette
If we submit to this, I'm afraid there will be no turning back. Under the guise of protecting the interests of the people and their health, the government will try to regulate all sorts of personal activities; because as we found out with the bailouts, once you take their money, you are their business; no exceptions. Will people be afraid to speak out against their government for fear of retaliation when they are in their sickbed? Will the party in power be able to give preferential treatment to loyalists and use the system to suppress dissent? Once you transition from a financial asset to a financial liability in your older years or in your failing health, will the Government mark you ineligible for treatment? Many more questions should be asked, that's where you come in.
Even if the government could do this better,when so much Liberty is the cost, we can't afford it.
Sorry
Login or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!