Loading Loading
Just for optimization

Politics.comforum

freecreditcheck.com |  creditreports.com |  whois.domaintools.com |  bookclub.com

Deal with the Devil: What are you willing to trade for your Liberty?

Deal with the Devil: What are you willing to trade for your Liberty?

 

FREEDOMMM (Republican) - Member Since: Mar 20th, 2009 - Debate started 9 months ago

In late 2007, a poll was conducted among NYU students(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/6892.html ) where the question was posed, " What would you trade for your right to vote?". Some 20% of the sample would make the trade for an iPod Touch; a full two thirds, or 66% would trade it for a free ride through college; half of the group also were willing to forfeit their vote for $1 million. Hearing that made me think that somewhere our Founding Fathers were spinning in their Graves.

This is hardly new though. For decades politicians have been making promises, trying to buy the votes of their constituents. The common misconceptions people seem to have though, are that politicians either pull these things out of thin air or they get an unpopular group(the rich, smokers, foreign manufacturers, etc.) to pay for it. They don't realize that they are funding these things themselves at a much higher price than if they had bought whatever it was outright.

Forget the fact that bureaucracies are horribly inefficient for a minute and couldn't care less if your money is spent wisely; there's a much larger issue at play: What are you buying? Those same people who think they're getting something for nothing are actually paying someone to take their liberty. They are unable to put two and two together; they know they aren't as free as their parents were, but don't realize what President Gerald Ford did, "A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."
The same government that can't even manage the recently acquired financial sector or car companies without hemorrhaging money now wants to give us "Universal Healthcare Coverage."Our Congress doesn't even read the bills they vote on and has spent more money in the first few months of 2009 than every government from 1776 to 2008. THESE people want to "fix" healthcare, sort of the way the Stimulus has "fixed" the economy.

Let's pretend that Central Planning works(to go into why it doesn't is a whole other forum, think of that economic juggernaut, the Soviet Union) and that these incompetent lawyers that managed to get elected actually had a way to meet the Healthcare needs of 300 million individuals; What are we trading for this miracle cure-all? Your ability to make decisions about your own health and well being, as well as the wants and wishes of any family member you would have previously decided for. The Stimulus Bill set up a comparative effectiveness board that will make determinations of what protocol to use for given medical conditions, to insure a streamlined, one size fits all approach to the allocation of medical resources. If that sounded like rationing, they tried their damnedest to make sure it didn't.

Our founding fathers went to painstaking lengths ensure that government wouldn't be in any advantageous position to abuse it's power over the people; they put restraints on the Federal government because they didn't trust it. How would a man like Benjamin Franklin react to our giving the Federal Government the ability to determine whether we live or die? Can't be sure, but he did say this in the Poor Richard;s Almanack in 1738, "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power." How about Jefferson?"I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That "all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people." To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition." --Letter to Gen. Lafayette

If we submit to this, I'm afraid there will be no turning back. Under the guise of protecting the interests of the people and their health, the government will try to regulate all sorts of personal activities; because as we found out with the bailouts, once you take their money, you are their business; no exceptions. Will people be afraid to speak out against their government for fear of retaliation when they are in their sickbed? Will the party in power be able to give preferential treatment to loyalists and use the system to suppress dissent? Once you transition from a financial asset to a financial liability in your older years or in your failing health, will the Government mark you ineligible for treatment? Many more questions should be asked, that's where you come in.

Even if the government could do this better,when so much Liberty is the cost, we can't afford it.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

53 Posts New Post

Sorry

or Register to reply.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

padokc (Republican) - 9 months ago

The following idea has been copied over the years by many scholars but it original authorship has been attributed to the writings of and lectures of Alexander Tytler a professor (1745-1813). It is interesting that so many academics have tried to "own" this idea and they so heartily agree with Tytler. (Remember America is not a democracy and that it is often called rule by majority or "mob rule".)

Tytler s believed that a democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.

Bondage to Spiritual Faith;
Spiritual Faith to Courage;
Courage to Freedom;
Freedom to Abundance;
Abundance to Selfishness;
Selfishness to Complacency;
Complacency to Apathy;
Apathy to Fear;
Fear to Dependency;
Dependency to Bondage

A democracy as you all know is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives : capitalism and democracy are ascendant in the third world.

• a state governed in such a way : a multiparty democracy.
• control of an organization or group by the majority of its members : the intended extension of industrial democracy.
• the practice or principles of social equality : demands for greater democracy.

American s form of government is not a democracy; it is a constitutional republic. A republic is a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.
• archaic figurative a community or group with a certain equality between its members.

Benjamin Frankiln said this: - A democracy is two wolves and a small lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.

A constitutional republic only works only if the constitution is maintained in tact and followed. That is the problem with the current Obama administration and former administrations...they have "bent" the constitution to their whims and so diluting and overstepping their powers set forth in the constitution. This is a left wing Congress who are "selling" our freedoms for their leftist socialist pafacist ideologies....and so the down fall of America and it's progression looks very much like Tytler's insightful progression.


of our but a republic.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ironhead (Libertarian) - 9 months ago

I would accept nothing in exchange for my liberty. I wouldn t except all the money in the world, if I was not free to choose what to do with it.

Similarly, I have always believed that as long as others are held captive, I do not consider myself completely free. I will never use drugs, but others might to ease the pain of a chronic illness. I would probably not buy a bunch of expensive cars, but others might really want to. I would never purchase the services of a prostitute, but others have done so since the beginning of time. I will never be African-American, but the U.S. government's racist drug war and criminal justice system treat those of this ethnicity differently than they do others. I will never be 18-25 again, but others who are that age may be forced into virtual slavery via military draft. I might never decide to purchase a gun, but others do so to protect themselves, their families, and their property every day. I might never be exceptionally wealthy, but those who have done so without using force or fraud have done so legitimately and deserve every cent they have earned - their money belongs to them and not to anyone else. I might never live in another country, but those who do are often killed by the decisions of the U.S. government because their government behaves in a way which ours disapproves (without even attacking our nation).

I raise all of these points, because these are just some of the examples of government depredations of liberty. Eventually, if allowed to do so, the state will take away something that you enjoy or need. Ironically, the state can never take away our fundamental liberty of self-determination and self-control. If they were able to control our minds, you can be certain they would do so.

I honestly feel that those who would answer that they would accept certain material goods, wealth, etc. if it meant they had to relinquish their freedom or certain freedoms - these individuals simply do not know or have not thought through what that really means. If they did, if they realized the scope and depth of what individual liberty really means - they would never give it up. Why? Because it is a fundamental human need to be free; it is in our nature to do so. External control feels wrong and unjust. One can observe this even amongst animals - but human beings have basic needs, and freedom of action and self-determination is one of those needs. Culture might shape how one views their freedom, but it is expressed nevertheless.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

I have often wondered what the founding fathers would say when they look at the voter turnout for recent elections. There was a time when the voting population was in line with the adult population. Nowadays we say "did you vote?" before we continue with questions along that line. Our society has become so jaded, dare I say blinded, that many don't even consider voting a necessity. The proof is in how many young persons would trade their right to vote for monetary considerations. People forget that the right to vote was THE impetus to gain our independence from GB way back in the day. Not slavery, oil, jobs, etc. The right to vote. We need to get back to basics. That means no to big government. It means no to Socialized Medicine for sure. It means using your right to vote.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Response to padokc
The following idea has been copied over the years by many scholars but it original authorship has be … Show full post

I agree. The thing that bothers me the most is at the end of the day it is the lack of foresight of the American people that has paved the way for our own demise. The current administration, as with the ones before, throws a bone out there to placate the masses (see stimulus). However each bone erodes the foundation of democracy until what you have left is something we can no longer stand on. It is our fault.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Great post. Although when you were listing quotes you forgot one that is quite fitting. "We must be ready to dare all for our country. For history does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. We must acquire proficiency in defense and display stamina in purpose.
We must be willing, individually and as a Nation, to accept whatever sacrifices may be required of us. A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both."-Dwight D. Eisenhower. I would give up my Liberty for nothing in this universe. Nothing at all.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

I'm sorry. I did not answer the question. The answer is nothing.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

TheyreALLliars (Libertarian) - 9 months ago

Great forum! I am sure you will get a good coversation flowing.
Benjamin Franklin thought even a life wasn't worth giving up freedom for- "Any society that would give up liberty for security will deserve neither and lose both." That is exactly what this government is doing. They are using scare tactics to make us willingly give up our freedom. If you don't support this, the terrorist win. I fyou don't support this, we'll all be unemployed. If you don't support this, you'll die. This is why almost every constitutional right we have is under attack. It isn't a Republican or a Democrat thing- they all use the same rhetoric- fear. When someone says that freedom shouldn't have a price at all, they're excluded from the conversation. Why? Because it makes too much sense and may convert the ones that are motivated by fear.
-Danielle

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Patriot Watch (Independent) - 9 months ago

Response to amnestymyazz
I have often wondered what the founding fathers would say when they look at the voter turnout for re … Show full post

agreed with everything. As far as voter turnout is concerned when the people feel there is no viable cand or that their voice does not count they dont bother

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago

Response to ironhead
I would accept nothing in exchange for my liberty. I wouldn t except all the money in the world, if … Show full post

Don't totally agree with you, but that was still a fine anwser. Thank You

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago

Response to TheyreALLliars
Great forum! I am sure you will get a good coversation flowing. Benjamin Franklin thought even a … Show full post

Was trying to be an equal oppertunity skeptic; I don't want George Bush to micromanage my life any more than I do Barack Obama to. Thoreau was right,"The government that governs best governs least."
These Central Planners are not equipped to run our lives for us, put your liberties first.
A fine comment, thank you.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago

Response to countryplowboy
Great post. Although when you were listing quotes you forgot one that is quite fitting. "We mus … Show full post

Had so many quotes I wanted to post. The following are JUST from Jefferson, the supposed founder of the modern Democrat Party:
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it."

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. "

"Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition."

"History, in general, only informs us of what bad government is."

"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."

" I own that I am not a friend to a very energetic government. It is always oppressive."

" It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others: or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own. "

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ironhead (Libertarian) - 9 months ago

Response to FREEDOMMM
Don't totally agree with you, but that was still a fine anwser. Thank You

Thanks for pointing out the forum post. This is always a topic that I feel strongly about - as should everyone, IMO.

I would expect both liberals and conservatives to disagree with parts of what I said. Liberals might disagree with the guns and taxation part, Conservatives might disagree with the foreign policy, war on drugs, and criminal justice system part.

I deliberately covered the spectrum of issues to try to underscore the fact that government isn't going to stop with certain freedoms that are preferred by certain groups. The institution of the state seems to know only one rule: consolidate and expand power. If this principle is consistently applied - and I think an honest evaluation of our history shows such a trend - eventually most liberties will be taken away. We're just not quite near the end yet. We're not to the breaking point just yet where people begin really resisting. That's what's going on in Iran right now. Americans simply don't believe they need to resist just yet.

We will get there eventually, if things continue on as they have over the last 100 years or so. For every liberating thrust (end of slavery, the end of Jim Crow segregation, political equality for women and minorities) we have experienced terrible thrusts of coercion (heavy taxation, massive government, seemingly endless wars and hegemonic foreign policy, the war on drugs, nanny-state laws). The more society tries to use the state to solve its problems, the more the state demands control of society and individuals.

People make a serious mistake when they believe that capitalism is a zero-sum game; it's not and can't be by definition. Government is the biggest zero-sum game in town. The only way to stop it is to minimize its importance and control. This starts by emphasizing the ability of individuals and voluntary society to take care of our problems without the state. Most conservatives and liberals do not like this idea - and this is why you see these trends which you so lament.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Clayton9504 (Republican) - 9 months ago

I would not give my liberty for anything. I would die for my liberty and will keep it that way... forever!

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago

Response to ironhead
Thanks for pointing out the forum post. This is always a topic that I feel strongly about - as shou … Show full post

I totally agree that it is foolish to look to the government to solve society's problems. I disagree with your foreign policy assessments, as previously stated. Your half right on the War on Drugs and the Criminal Justice System
We all see these trends, some of us are still in denial though. Thank you for your prompt, thoughtful response.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Response to FREEDOMMM
Had so many quotes I wanted to post. The following are JUST from Jefferson, the supposed founder of … Show full post

"If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for the law. It invites every man to become a law unto himself. It invites anarchy."-U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis

"Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty."-John Basil Barnhill

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations"-James Madison

"Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government."-James Madison

"The problem to be solved is, not what form of government is perfect, but which of the forms is least imperfect."-James Madison

"Giving money and power to Government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys."-P. J. O'Rourke

"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."-Patrick Henry

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never will be."-Thomas Jefferson

"Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for."-Will Rogers

Plenty more but these work. And thiose quotes you gave were good. Although my favorite istill. "The problem with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, it's that they know so much that isn't so."-Ronald Reagan

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Good Ole Boy (Independent) - 9 months ago

Response to FREEDOMMM
Had so many quotes I wanted to post. The following are JUST from Jefferson, the supposed founder of … Show full post

Jefferson must of had a crystal ball because it seems he knew what was coming. I also tend to qoute him. Those kids have no idea that people died for that right, and I blame the school system, liberals, and a society that promotes materialism.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Response to FREEDOMMM
Had so many quotes I wanted to post. The following are JUST from Jefferson, the supposed founder of … Show full post

What I find very interesting is these axioms reverberate now as loudly as they did almost 300 years ago. So many in our society want to get away from the lessons taught back then. They cite living in a different era necessitates the switch. The second amendment is just one thing always under attack. People today are no different than any peoples that have ever lived. They want the chance to live their lifes as they see fit. They want to have a say in what happens in their communities. They want to know this country will still be there for their children and their childrens children. Those kind of things do not and will not change. We may have ipods, the internet, velcro and whatever other innovations come down the pipe. At the end of the day our core wants and needs will not change. That all starts with our liberty.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Response to ironhead
I would accept nothing in exchange for my liberty. I wouldn t except all the money in the world, if … Show full post

"If they were able to control our minds, you can be certain they would do so. "- I find it interesting that one of the first paradigms of Political Science as a field of study separate from "governmental studies," was Behavioralism. Behavioralism said that the values attitudes and beliefs, or the political culture, within a population determine political outcomes. As such, there were immense studies done to trying to figure out how to influence people's values attitudes and beliefs... Now political scientists have moved into the paradigm of the "new institutionalism" which focuses on the effect of institutional rules on people's behavior.
I wonder if this means that institutions determine the political culture. the political culture is defined as people's values attitudes and beliefs, to be clear.
This paradigm has proven "useful" to political scientists because in society everywhere, the "institutional framework," as created by government, undeniably shapes our choices and therefore our behavior.
For example, I doubt that those who bought houses they could not afford would have done so if the housing market regulation had been continued. It seems that in the case of the housing market people traded their house for freedom and financial security as well.
My main point is that corporate and state power has and always will attempt to attain more power than its been given. I think that is what was truly meant by Hobbes' Leviathan metaphor.
Also let me be clear about another thing. Those in "power" do not hold office...ever. They'll never need to hold office. They can "buy" any office they need to buy. Corruption reigns as long as nobody cares or doesn't know about it.

Ok, basically I do think that the institutional framework of any goverment determines the minds of its people. This is dangerous because those in power in government do not have the power. Who ever has the money has the power. Politicians need money to get in office and a lot of it. I would imagine that those who control the government also control the corporate media. An evidence of this control was depicted in the documentary film "Shouting Fire" on HBO. Two reporters from different media stations said exactly the same thing...word for word...about the republican national convention. I really don't think it was coincidental.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Response to Good Ole Boy
Jefferson must of had a crystal ball because it seems he knew what was coming. I also tend to qoute … Show full post

agreed! material things or might I quote stephen king and say "needful things?"

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Seems to me that we traded quite a bit after the "Patriot" Act was signed. Americans were waving their flags and thanking Bush for spying on them.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ironhead (Libertarian) - 9 months ago

Response to Jim Trebowski
Seems to me that we traded quite a bit after the "Patriot" Act was signed. Americans were … Show full post

Absolutely correct. As I've pointed out a number of times on this site, it's very amusing how many conservatives now invoke the Constitution in protest over Obama's policies, but so many walked in lockstep with Bush as he gangfucked the rule of law again and again. Also ironic of course, are so many liberals who were so critical of Bush's policies, but are now perfectly happy when Obama has continued many of the same policies.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Response to ironhead
Absolutely correct. As I've pointed out a number of times on this site, it's very amusing how many … Show full post

Dr. Paul? Is that you? LOL

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ironhead (Libertarian) - 9 months ago

Response to Jim Trebowski
Dr. Paul? Is that you? LOL

I'll take that as a compliment, thank you very much. :)

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago

Response to Jim Trebowski
Seems to me that we traded quite a bit after the "Patriot" Act was signed. Americans were … Show full post

You diverted a conversation about liberty being stolen today to liberty that was stolen yesterday, all because the guy who stole it yesterday was a Republican and the guy stealing today is a democrat.. The Patriot Act was in 2001, why doesn't Barry repeal it if it was so terrible? Libs are full of crap on the Patriot Act and only attacked it over partisan politics. They never cared about the flaws of the patriot act, just about inciting hatred against Bush.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

FREEDOMMM (Republican) - 9 months ago

Response to ironhead
Absolutely correct. As I've pointed out a number of times on this site, it's very amusing how many … Show full post

This is really the making of a whole new forum, but let's stipulate that the Patriot Act is fundamentally flawed. I think some of the provisions are necessary. What in particular do you, as a libertarian, find to be egregious about it? Not trying to be a smartass or anything, would like to hear detail as opposed to the same old saw ' Our freedom went out the window with the patriot act'.

you've said before (paraphrasing) that it did no good to endow the government with wartime powers that were either ambiguous or violations of our rights; you may very well not support giving any of those tools to the Federal government, that is understandable. Would you mind giving me a brief clarifacation?

It still doesn't change what Obama's doing to the country, and I am annoyed at the left obfuscating and diverting away from that with what happened almost a decade ago. Obama's usurpations are much larger than Bush's, and we are only 6 months in.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

1 - 25 / 52
Previous 1 2 3 Next
53 Posts New Post