1

Support Judge Don Lowery For U.S. Senator

llinois is one of the states that can elect a Republican to replace a Democrat in the Senate. Don Lowery is a solid conservative and values the Constitution. The RNC is endorsing Mark Kirk a liberal RINO that voted for Cap and Trade as a Representative in the House and he is pro late term partial abortion and against the Child Interstate Abortion Act http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=7972&can_id=33502 . He is also anti-gun.

Don Lowery is a retired judge and served in the Army in Korea and Viet Nam. He is pro life and progun.To see his views on the issues go to   http://www.judgelowery4ussenate.com/wordpress/

Don Lowery is a chance to put a “real” conservative in the Senate that will be for real change that will get us smaller government, lower taxes, and adherence to the Constitution. He can use your support as the RNC isn’t helping him please go to http://www.judgelowery4ussenate.com/wordpress/  and donate what you can. This is a grass roots effort and no matter how small a donation they add up.

I put this in as a blog because the site will not add my and Hepsy's blog on the site list and never posts the articles.

2

Conspiracy in the Courts?

 The California Federal Obama eligibility case presided over by Judge Carter was dismised today after Carter had previously stated in court it would go forward to trial on Jan. 26, 2010. The judge dismissed the case for the reasons the court could not overturn the voters and the court did not have jurisdiction. Just like all the other cases, the evidence was never investigated or examined. To infer congress was to investigate this matter is putting the fox in charge of the hen house. Now obama can say out in the open I was born in Kenya and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.

Courts have said the plaintiffs didn't have standing, then who does? They have said the COLB was on the INTERNET and had been proven legit, by what governmental entity?   There was no investigation into Obama's eligibility status before the election even though there were calls for it and McCain was checked out. The courts have opted out and the congress will never look into this. We could now have a foreign born president with a willing majority party become dictator and suspend all elections to rule for life and you and I could do nothing short of revolt. Thing is they would have to get the guns. Guess what? Obama want's them.

You look at the evidence and decide.

1) Obama has put on the internet as proof of natural born status a Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth or COLB it has been proven by many to be a fraudulent document but that is irrelevant, it is not a birth certificate and at that time Hawaii was giving out COLBS to aliens not born in this country.

2) Obama has spent over 1 million dollars and an unknown amount of taxpayer money on DOJ lawyers to fight disclosing his birth certificate, passport records, college and school records, name changes, medical records, and draft records. All have been sealed by executive order. If he is fighting so hard to hide these documents, why? where I'm from if you work to hide something it means you have done something wrong, it's typical for kids and adults to hide what they are ashamed to show.

3)Obama talks in his book that he went to Pakistan with friends when no US passported individual could. What country's passport did he use?

4)His name on Indonesian school records is Barry Soweto and there are no records available as to a name change. Who is he?

5)His paternal grandmother said she was present at his birth in Kenya and his maternal grandmother said he was born there too. There are no doctors, nurses, or anyone that has come forward stating they were at his birth in Hawaii.

6)The Obama administration and family members have given two different hospitals as his birth place.

7)He admitted in the Illinois Senate race he was not a natural born citizen and has a Kenyan born father that would give him dual citizenship at best. His mother was not old enough to give him citizenship if born in Kenya. Either negates natural born.  

I'm sure there are people on the site and those filing court cases have more, but I came up with these as I wrote them. There seems to be real strong evidence of a conspiracy in the courts to conceal evidence and not allow the judicial system to work. Have these judges been threatened? Have they been bought off?

2

TYRANNY

  The founders crafted a system of government that left no branch stronger than the others with a system of checks and balances. This has worked with minor glitches for 200 years. Same party majorities in the house and senate have given presidents a much easier time in passing bills that they see as needed. Restraint on presidents from overstepping his constitutional bounds were seen as a congressional duty even when the president enjoyed a majority held congress. A good portion of our countries history the voters balanced the system by electing a president from the party with a minority stake in the congress which ensured restraint.

  We now have democrats with majority of the house and senate. The president is a democrat. Obama is a far left liberal as is the leadership in the house. Two bills that were extremely costly and totaled over 4,000 pages were passed quickly without being read and then signed by the president. Republicans were shut out of the process that affects all the population.

  Obama has broken laws. The firing of the Independent Prosecutor was done without the required 30 day notice and no cause was given. The prosecutor was in the process of investigating a friend of Obamas for fraud and misuse of federal funds. When Bush fired a little over a half dozen of federal prosecutors that served at his pleasure the democrats were up in arms and had one investigation after another, Bill Clinton fired all 90 some when he came into office. No congressional investigations have been called for and no special prosecutor appointed.

   Obama has apparently broken campaign fund law by paying around one million dollars from his campaign fund to fight the BC issue cases. Campaign fund laws are full of loopholes and there may be wiggle room for him, but it merits an investigation. Obama also squashed the investigation of ACORN to which has ties to from his years as a community organizer in Chicago. No investigations or special prosecutor appointed.

  Obama has created over 20 czars. They are plainly unconstitutional, it is congress and the supreme courts duty to state it and stop him. Presidents before him have been stopped from this type of action. The takeover of the auto industries is also unconstitutional. Congress is quiet and the supreme court has heard no cases involved.

  The checks and balances that have protected our freedom and Democracy are gone. Obama can now break laws and enact unconstitutional laws and executive orders with impunity. A tyrant has been created and our freedom and Democracy are endangered.   

9

LIBERALS AND OBAMA LOVERS Answer this!!!!!!!!!!!!

Obama's campaign fund has spent around one million dollars on fighting eligibility suits according to mulitiple sources. Which may be against campaign fund laws. He is refusing to provide a birth certificate and school records. The fact he is fighting what Americans routinely do to obtain IDs and other documentation is indicative there is something he is hiding. The ANSWER I want is, Why is he fighting producing these documents?  I have asked liberals and obamamaniacs this question and none will answer it.

6

THIS WAR IS FOR REAL

     This is a email from a friend still in the Army  and from 3 years ago  THIS WAR IS FOR REA> > This WAR is for REAL!> >> > To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it. Our countryis now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, thatwe have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).> >> > The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there arevery few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer whorealize what losing really means.> >> > First, let's examine a few basics:> >> > 1. When did the threat to us start?> > Many will say September 11, 2001.> > The answer as far as the United States is concerned is 1979, 22 yearsprior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:> > * Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;> > * Beirut, Lebanon Embassy 1983;> > * Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;> > * Lockerbie, Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;> > * First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;> > * Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;> > * Nairobi, Kenya US Embassy 1998;> > * Dares Salaam, Tanzania US Embassy 1998;> > * Aden, Yemen USS Cole 2000;> > * New York World Trade Center 2001;> > * Pentagon 2001.> > (Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581terrorist attacks worldwide).> >> > 2. Why were we attacked?> > Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attackshappened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1,Clinton and Bush 2. We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats asthere were no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediatepredecessor, President Ford.> >> > 3. Who were the attackers?> > In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.> >> > 4. What is the Muslim population of the World?> > 25%.> >> > 5. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?> > Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that thepredominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under thedictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Chris tian), that made nodifference. You either went along with the administration or you wereeliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis forpolitical reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests).> > (see http://www.Nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm)> > Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, asthe six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heardof anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept theworld focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who gotin his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world - German,Christian or any others.> >> > Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US, butkill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, French or anyoneelse. The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of noprotection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslimsthere may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslimleaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their ownpronouncements -- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peacefulMuslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die?> >> > 6. So who are we at war with?> > There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than theMuslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizingthis conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you don'tclearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.> > So with that background, now to the two major questions:> > 1. Can we lose this war?> > 2. What does losing really mean?> >> > If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions:> >> > We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, themajor reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom theanswer to the second question - What does losing mean?> >> > It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war meanshanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business,like post-Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get.> >> > What losing really means is:> > We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attackswill not subside, but rather will steadily increase. Remember, they want usdead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not haveproduced an increasing series of attacks against us, over the past 18 years.The plan was, clearly, for terrorists to attack us until we were neuteredand submissive to them.> > We would, of course, have no future support from other nations, for fearof reprisals and for the reason that they would see; we are impotent andcannot help them.> > They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It willbe increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. Itdoesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw itstroops from Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed theirtrain and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spainto do will be done. Spain is finished.> >> > The next will probably be France. Our one hope on France is that theymight see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished too,in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However, it mayalready be too late for France. France is already 20% Muslim and fadingfast!> >> > Without our support Great Britan will go too. reently I read thatthere are more mosques in England than churches.> >> > If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of lifewill all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal withus if they were threatened by the Muslims. If we can't stop the Muslimterrorists, how could anyone else?> >> > The radical Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, andtherefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We better knowit too and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.> >> > Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple.Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100%of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100%effort to win.> >> > So, how can we lose the war?> >> > Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by "imploding."That is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and theirpurpose, and really digging in and lending full support to the war effort.If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to bedivided, there is no way that we can win!> >> >> > Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend thelife and death seriousness of this situation.> >> > President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. Doesthat sound like we are taking this thing seriously? This is war! For theduration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights we havebecome accustomed to. We had better be prepared to lose some of our civilrights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them permanently.> >> > And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty ofcivil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victoryand in fact added many more since then.> >> > Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?> > No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of ourPolitical Correctness, and all of our civil rights during this conflict andhave a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Getthem out of your head.> >> > Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or theAdministration that it almost seems they would literally like to see uslose.> >> > I think some actually do, I hasten to add that this isn't because theyare disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means.Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we aredivided and weakening. It concerns our friends, and it does great damage toour cause.> >> > Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and mediaregarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies bestwhat I am saying. We have recently had an issue, involving the treatment ofa few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police.These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing theirown people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tonguesand otherwise murdering their own people just for disagreeing with SaddamHussein.> >> > And just a few years ago these same type prisoners chemically killed400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are also the sametype of enemy fighters, who recently were burning Americans, and draggingtheir charred corpses through the streets of Iraq. And still more recently,the same type of enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sourcesinternationally, of the beheading of American prisoners they held.> >> > Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for severaldays have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" ofsome Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charredcorpses through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.> >> > Can this be for real?> >> > The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of theSecretary of Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack ofcomprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we arefighting, the life and death struggle we are in and the disastrous resultsof losing this war, nothing can.> >> > To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over thisprisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned --totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world. Neither we, norany other country, can survive this internal strife. Again I say, this doesnot mean that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal. Itsimply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude of thesituation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushingus, for many years.> >> > These people are a serious and dangerous liability to the war effort.We must take note of who they are and get them out of office. Remember, theMuslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels! That translates intoALL non-Muslims -- not just in the United States, but throughout the world.We are the last bastion of defense.> >> > We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant.' Thatcharge is valid in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we believethat we are so good, powerful and smart, that we can win the hearts andminds of all those who attack us, and that with both hands tied behind ourback, we can defeat anything bad in the world! We can't!> >> > If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not survive,and no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.> >> > And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allowfreedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of thepress, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or anystatus for women, or that have been productive in one single way thatcontributes to the good of the world.> >> > This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this waror we will be equated in the history books to the self-inflicted fall of theRoman Empire. If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books tobe written or read.> >> >> > If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how theMuslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue toincrease the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach little bylittle, on the established French traditions. The French will be fightingamong themselves, over what should or should not be done, which willcontinue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve.> > Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?> >> > Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by someexternal military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away,politically correct piece by politically correct piece.> >> > And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown,worldwide that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even tothemselves, once they are in power.> >> > They have universally shown that when they have taken over, they thenstart brutally killing each other over who will be the few who control themasses.> >> > What is happening in Iraq is a good example. Will we ever stophearing from the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims"?> >> > I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above. If we areunited, there is no way that we can lose. I hope now, after the election,the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation weare in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we aretalking about! Do whatever you can to preserve it. I reiterate. Anational election is months away.> >> > After reading the above, we all must do this not only for ourselves,but our children, our grandchildren, our country and the world. WhetherDemocrat or Republican, conservative or liberal and that includes thePoliticians and media of our country and the free world!> >> > Please forward this to any you feel may want, or NEED to read it.Our "leaders" in Congress ought to read it, too. There are those that findfault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks throughthis, that we must UNITE!> >> > Lastly, I wish to add: At the risk of offending someone, Isincerely think that anyone who rejects this as just another political rant,or doubts the seriousness of this issue or just deletes it without sendingit on, is part of the problem. Lets quit laughing at and forwarding thejokes and cartoons which denigrate and ridicule our leaders in this waragainst terror. They are trying to protect the interests and well being ofthe US and it's citizens. Best we support them.