3

a Lady as President?

cross posted at hepsy.wordpress.com

What’s wrong with Sarah?

Sarah is a lady.

It was the image contrasting last year’s First Lady on the left and this year’s First Lady positioned on the right that made me realize my hesitancy with Sarah Palin.

Politics: always spinning, the truth is there, somewhere, usually tucked between the folds of the spun propaganda. The Left has made quite the investment in convincing US that Sarah is stupid. And they’re looking to spend more to discredit her, with the DNC currently raising money for attack ads against her. Shouldn’t take too long to figure out that the Left isn’t as convinced of her stupidity as they would present her, as they want you to believe.

I couldn’t quite put my finger on my hesitancy about Sarah. When considering the prevarication of MSM, political pundits and the DNC against her it became obvious that she is not stupid. Either she isn’t stupid, or the Piper on the Left is, for expending so much energy and money in paltering a truly stupid person. Or am I wrong, the Left really is that stupid?

Then I saw the Change picture, Laura on the left and Michelle on the right, and instantly knew why I was holding out in supporting Sarah. Sarah is a lady. She’s feminine. Can a Lady be an effective President?

Not every woman is a lady. Laura Bush is a graceful lady. As First Lady, Laura presented herself as well groomed, well dressed, as though she respects the people who look up to her. That’s Laura. Laura isn’t the first First Lady to be a graceful lady, but she is the most recent. Michelle, on the other hand, doesn’t hesitate to present herself rumpled and flippant. Laura filled her role as First Lady as a dignified lady. Michelle is extravagant in her nouveau riche position, yet all the gold in the world can’t make her the lady she is not. Michelle is filling her role as First Lady as, well, a pretentious woman.

When imagining a female President, isn’t it easier to picture a masculinized woman? What woman in power is, or has been, a lady, or even feminine? Few. Not recent women prominently in American politics, as Hillary C., Nancy P., Madeline A. or Janet N., hardly feminine. They’re women in power. Women, not Ladies.

It isn’t easy to picture a lady, feminine like Sarah, in the role of President, is it? Men like to look at her, and she’s smart. She’s sincere, likely the non-politician in her. She’s soft and cuddly, her edges feminine. Her administrative experience, tested decision-making, resilience to attack, etc., get lost when people look at her. Even with her glasses on she’s a sexy, feminine lady.

What’s wrong with Sarah? Sarah is a lady.

A lady can be every bit as effective as any man.

Especially a lady qualified as Sarah.

A Lady for President?

You betcha!

4

Voodoo Doll for Poking

The Bush Voodoo Doll got all poke with pins whenever I didn't like what he did.

Don't like the Remade America? Poke

Don't like the Unread, Pass It Now Porker? Poke

Don't like the Saudi bow? Poke

Don't like the Alinsky connection? Poke

Don't like the Community? Poke

Now it's Your Turn.

Only one rule: No Racism!

:)

2

O

“I wouldn’t worry so much about the joker posters, Mr. President. If this ever catches on and your policies are reduced to three letter ridicule, well then sir, you are in real trouble.”

Quote from the posted video, "O- the Power of Iconography" Be sure to watch!

originally posted at hepsy.wordpress.com

9

Media's Czars

Obama doesn’t appoint Czars. He appoints people to positions he creates, at his pleasure, at his whim, outside the arm of the American People.

Media names them Czars.

We can’t vote them out. We can’t talk to them. They don’t have to listen to us, or even pretend to care about our insights or objections. They are represent Taxation without Representation.

read more at hepsy.wordpress.com

2

Obama's Czars

It is a reality attested by all history that if a republic assumes imperial functions it will not remain a republic.  – Felix Morley (1894-1981), American Journalist, Educator and Author

 

What’s the newest fad in subverting Representation of the Republic of the United States of America?Installing Czars.

What’s the newest Czar to dictate the will of the forming oligarchy?Obama’s TV Czar.

Where’s the best place to hide the newly governing oligarchy Obama is installing? In plain sight because, like Abortion, Gay Rights and Stimulus Package, the word Czar is Politically Correct.

How does it figure?

+ Obama Czars+ Executive Orders= Government over We the People, without Representation.

Let the people think they govern and they will be governed.– William Penn (1693)

1

United States, a Country of Muslims?

Obama has said we're a country of Muslims.

He also said Muslims helped make our country.

Over 78% of Americans claim Christianity as their religion.

If our country is any religion, it is Christian (2007 est.):

• Protestant 51.3%
• Roman Catholic 23.9%
• Mormon 1.7%
• other Christian 1.6%
• Jewish 1.7%
• Buddhist 0.7%
• Muslim 0.6%
• other or unspecified 2.5%
• unaffiliated 12.1%
• none 4%

There are no Muslims identified among the Framers of our Constitution:

• Congregationalist 7
• Deist 3
• Dutch Reformed 2
• Episcopal 24
• Lutheran 2
• Methodist 2
• Presbyterian 9
• Quaker 3
• Roman Catholic 2

This country, founded by mostly Christian men, and whose citizens are predominately Christian, has been claimed a country of Muslims. Did you notice that Michelle skipped this visit to Cairo, and skipped the Saudi Arabia when Obama bowed to the king? Hmmm..... I wonder why.

It is already Politically Incorrect to talk about the things that most of US are, Christian.

How much a country of Muslims are we, US, to become?

3

Mugshot Fashion Rage

There's a new fashion rage for Mugshots.

You can see it on my blog: Mugshot Fashion Rag