Recently Submitted News
Financial reform, what's the right way?
Politico - "The overall result of the last-minute changes is a bill that was much tougher than many on...
Sean Penn Suggests Prison Time for Journalists Who Call Hugo
Newsbusters - Sean Penn went on a rant in defense of Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez, suggesting prison time for...
Chairman Zero Picks a Fight with Israel- WHY?
Reaganite - That's a good question, especially after the way he's licked Hugo Chavez' posterior.
Pelosi forces Americans to pay for liberals ABORTIONS
FOX News - Federal law since the 1970s has forbidden the use of taxpayer funds to cover abortions except in...
Impeach Barack Obama?
Reaganite - The Slaughter Solution would replace the rule of law with arbitrary one-party rule.
Obama promises broken in final bill...
San Fransisco Gate - And those "special deals" that Obama railed against and said he wanted to eliminate?
- 3 Comments
- Add a comment
Minnie T Mouse 6 months ago
This bill sounds like a Victorian Era throw-back. For too long a Woman nedded a man's permission to … Show full comment
DOESN'T sound very good for women in Ohio, Sounds complicated and also expensive !!!
I Suppose they will have about THREE CHOICES.....
Go elsewhere to another State or keep your Legs crossed neatly and nicely and Pray Real hard that you will not be Raped !!!
Ladies the Witch Hunt is in Full Circle !!
Elitheros (Libertarian) - 7 months ago
This bill sounds like a Victorian Era throw-back. For too long a Woman nedded a man's permission to … Show full comment
For argument sake -
Without the man's decision to take part in the process that created a need for the abortion, there would be no need for it. Therefore the man creates the situation as much as the woman, and deserves an equal right in the outcome. It takes two to get to that point, not just one. They both have an invested interest.
You know, if equality is truly the end goal.
Loading
0 comments
SPREAD THE WORD