Politics.comnews

hepsy 3 months ago

The underlying bias is in "preventing abortion" rather than saving a life. While the butchery of abortion at its finest isn t spelled out, the horrors of adoption are aggrandized.
THe mother did not want her baby killed, she wanted her baby adopted. She did not have the financial means to support the child, apparently lacked the family and coummunity support. Had she kept the baby, she, and the child, would likely have become dependent on taxpayers, or however you want to phrase it to soothe correctness.

Political Correctness would demonize an agency for making money on an adoption, as it is, evidently, preferred that mother and child either burden society, or the child be killed.

Political correctness would demonize an effort to preserve life, and have a child, instead, in an underprivileged area rather than praise adoptive parents for giving a child a far better chance in a loving home.

Any mother who has the courage, especially in this era of Political Correctness that mistakes a human beating heart for something else, to not abort her child, should be praised. For people, as in this article, to guide her into seeing the adoption agency as offensive is reflective of disregard for human life. An adoption clinic that helps a mother preserve the life of a human deserves a thank you, not vilification.

• Reply
• Add a new comment