Loading Loading
Just for optimization

Politics.comnews

freecreditcheck.com |  creditreports.com |  whois.domaintools.com |  bookclub.com

Mark Levin: Screw the Olympics- What about the War? Mark Levin: Screw the Olympics- What about the War?

Submitted by ReaganiteGOPer | 6 months ago

Reaganite - As usual, The Great One Mark Levin gets right-to-the-point: President Obama needs to get his freaking priorities straight... AND NOW.

And here you'll hear Levin give it to the Boy Wonder with both barrels blazing...

Tags: Obama, Olympics, Afghanistan, Taliban, Al Qaida

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ReaganiteGOPer (Republican) - 6 months ago

Reply to Good Ole Boy
I know Palin's stands but not Petraeus's, is he a real conservative for smaller government?

Well, Palin would set the policy, VP has precious little influence.

I would like him there to win the war... and put the Russians, Iranians, and Chavez back on their heels... Reagan style

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Patriot Watch (Independent) - 6 months ago

Reply to RN2009
I would have been disappointed if you hadn't resorted to your usual name-calling when someone says s … Show full comment

First of all you have NO idea what my opinion is on the war or Bush so back off because your talking like a crazy person.

I would of handled 9/11 totally differnt. i'm not going to go into it because you are not interested in facts and figures.. Your strictly party. if a conservative or independent says it- it's wrong.

I'd hash through your bs but I have bigger fish to fry. be careful though because I could rip up everything you have written here. Before you go blaming Bush for vest and other equipment would you like to see videos of liberals in their own words trying to get bs money written into war bills so they would vote YA.

You have to be kidding me. Liberals made deals behind some closed some not so closed doors to gain funds so they would vote to fund our troops.

As soon as you can prove out what a hypocrite I am I'll admit to that. Till than your only a liberal.

Oh and you know what is funny. obama has sat on troop request for 5 weeks now. thanks for killing our own to prove what ever liberal point you all are trying to pull.

If you havent called Washington in support of these troops your the Hypocrite. it is immorall to stumble across the battlefield than it is to go in and get it done. Less life is lost. Mainly AMERICAN loss. Something liberals give up every day.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Patriot Watch (Independent) - 6 months ago

Reply to C Rich
All this left -right stuff while they are robbing us blind: http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/10/s … Show full comment

C Rich this is the smartest thing I have heard in a long time. Conservatives have their views but the liberals on this site are holding fast to the company line.

Never liked our leader because i looked into him. Thats said I did believe he would clean up Washington. Not only did that not happen but Washington is dirtier today than it was yesterday.

Be nice for you to come around so solid debate can take place. Iron head is our only outlet. Otherwise everything is wonderful in liberal land.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

RN2009 (Democratic) - 6 months ago

Reply to Patriot Watch
Inspectors had nothing to do with Obama. Actually Obama hid information from the American people. YE … Show full comment

I would have been disappointed if you hadn't resorted to your usual name-calling when someone says something you don't like, or simply disagrees with you. Yes, OIL, like in Iraq. Where was your outrage then, when Bush left Afghanistan (where Osama was hiding), and sent our young people to Iraq with a lie for a reason? Where was your anger and dissent when so many of our troops and innocent civilians were killed? What did you have to say when the Bush administration wanted the families of the troops who were putting their lives on the line to send them money to buy their own body armor? Were you still strangely quiet? You called me coward and stupid. I have only one name for you: Hypocrite.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

C Rich (Independent) - 6 months ago

All this left -right stuff while they are robbing us blind:

http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/10/stuck-in-the-middle-with-you/

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 6 months ago

Reply to ReaganiteGOPer
Right on Chip... Obama is just trying to bring some cash to his scummy pals back in Chi Town- and … Show full comment

Yep, I love how the media (and meechelle) are spinning the trip like it was some sort of huge inconvenience for the obamas to take both of their entourages out to a beautiful city and schmooze with a bunch of liberal elites in order to convince the OIC that Chicago was the place to be in 2016. What a joke, they had it wrapped up before the trip or obama would have never gone. (all he needs is another loss)

Chicago is laden with coruption and greed, this will just pad their wallets and pocket books.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 6 months ago

Reply to RN2009
You may have a legitimate point, but I think I'll check it out elsewhere. Very appropriate website. … Show full comment

Malkin is hot, but don't discount her articles, she does alot of research and has this whole Olympics bid in her sights.

Chicago politics dictates that this win for the city will be a huge payout to the good friends of Daley and Obama.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 6 months ago

Reply to ironhead
Virtually everything I've ever read that he has written or said makes him a w*anker to me. I think … Show full comment

Yea, Ron Paul is great but really doesn't have a prayer of getting the white house. In all honesty, I don't think this country really has a prayer with out a complete cleansing of the house and senate. The fall of our system is as sure as death and taxes. Human nature is human nature, greed and power (of those who "represent" us) will take us out sooner than an Iranian nuke...

I just feel that the republicans are (in theory) more responsible than the dems. I think that Bush and the republicans had a chance to do some real reform in the early 2000's and blew it big time.

Maybe this administration and congress are giving us the shock treatment that we need to clean house and take the country back.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Patriot Watch (Independent) - 6 months ago

Reply to RN2009
Iran is letting the weapons inspectors in, thanks to negotiations. Would you prefer we antagonize th … Show full comment

Inspectors had nothing to do with Obama. Actually Obama hid information from the American people. YES he can lie and chew gum at the same time.

Amazing how you still support this guy. The writting is on the wall and you still dont get it.

He said he is taking 3 weeks to decide. So he needs 9 weeks to decide if he is going to save American lives. Wheres the outrage.

The DEAD soldiers are on you and Obamas shoulders. Good job.

Glad he went to pitch Chicago for the olympics while American men & women are dead

Oil what about it? Say it coward. You have absolutely ZERO proof of this oil thing. It is played like the race card.

Obama is bring the troops home. Remember? Hahahahaahahahaaha

Everytime you support this fool it makes us look good and you stupid.

OIL>>>>>>>>>>>>. ahahahahahaahahah

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Patriot Watch (Independent) - 6 months ago

Reply to RN2009
You may have a legitimate point, but I think I'll check it out elsewhere. Very appropriate website. … Show full comment

truth but hot air. liberals hate the truth because it stands in the way of the agenda.

I figured you wouldnt like her. She is rational and doing her job. You would rather tune into MSLSD and be lied to

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Good Ole Boy (Independent) - 6 months ago

Reply to ReaganiteGOPer
[We will have to see if they produce.] Like Palin-Petraeus 2012...? Show full comment

I know Palin's stands but not Petraeus's, is he a real conservative for smaller government?

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ReaganiteGOPer (Republican) - 6 months ago

Reply to Good Ole Boy
The peace thing is rather pollyanna, Duncan Hunter was a great canidate but got no GOP support. Ther … Show full comment

[We will have to see if they produce.]

Like Palin-Petraeus 2012...?

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ReaganiteGOPer (Republican) - 6 months ago

Reply to ChipBuffalo
Seriously though, here is where obama gives back BIG TIME to all his corrupt buddies in Chicago. The … Show full comment

Right on Chip...

Obama is just trying to bring some cash to his scummy pals back in Chi Town- and why anyone would want to stage any event in that toilet is beyond me. If it wasn't in Chicago, would Obama be headed to Copenhagen to lobby schmooze directly? If it was for some other US city... does anyone really think Obama would be working it like this?

It's all about having a large amount of money slushing around ChiTown for his racketeering pals in the Chicago machine to skim off of... and a little PR victory for the Dear Leader, who finds himself on the political ropes already...

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Good Ole Boy (Independent) - 6 months ago

Reply to ironhead
The GOP (except for Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, and Rand Paul) doesn't even remotely offer up free-marke … Show full comment

The peace thing is rather pollyanna, Duncan Hunter was a great canidate but got no GOP support. There is a push for real conservatives, Constitutional and fiscal. We will have to see if they produce.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ironhead (Libertarian) - 6 months ago

Reply to Good Ole Boy
Wasted votes helping liberals.

The GOP (except for Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, and Rand Paul) doesn't even remotely offer up free-market candidates or civil libertarians, let alone peace candidates. That means they offer nothing to me, so why in the sam hell would I want to vote for them?

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Good Ole Boy (Independent) - 6 months ago

Reply to ironhead
Virtually everything I've ever read that he has written or said makes him a w*anker to me. I think … Show full comment

Wasted votes helping liberals.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Good Ole Boy (Independent) - 6 months ago

Reply to RN2009
You may have a legitimate point, but I think I'll check it out elsewhere. Very appropriate website. … Show full comment

Just who profits from it, not the people south of Chicago. We just end up with higher taxes paying for it. The state can't pay the bills as it is. Some will profit big but the vast majority get shafted. No city holding an Olympics ends up anyplace but in the red afterwords.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ironhead (Libertarian) - 6 months ago

Reply to ChipBuffalo
Why is that ironhead? Tell me what makes him a w****r to you and the moveon.org movement. BTW, w … Show full comment

Virtually everything I've ever read that he has written or said makes him a w*anker to me. I think what started it was his moronic comments about Ron Paul and the larger libertarian movement last year.

The Presidency? I would vote for Ron Paul in a heartbeat. Short of Ron Paul getting the GOP nomination (assuming that he even runs in 2012, and extremely unlikely anyway), I will likely be voting for the Libertarian candidate, whomever that might be. I hope that whomever gets the LP nomination next time around, they will be better than Bob Barr. That was kind of a joke - he was supposed to garner more votes because he is more "moderate" (read: not really a libertarian by any definition) but got less votes than Ed Clark did back in 1980.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

RN2009 (Democratic) - 6 months ago

Reply to ChipBuffalo
Seriously though, here is where obama gives back BIG TIME to all his corrupt buddies in Chicago. The … Show full comment

You may have a legitimate point, but I think I'll check it out elsewhere. Very appropriate website. Malkin sure is full of hot air.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 6 months ago

Reply to ironhead
Mark Levin is a neocon tit who should be dismissed by anyone with half a brain. I don't care what y … Show full comment

Why is that ironhead? Tell me what makes him a w****r to you and the moveon.org movement.

BTW, who are you looking at to take the presidency? If you had your choice of what is available right now, who would you pick?

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 6 months ago

Seriously though, here is where obama gives back BIG TIME to all his corrupt buddies in Chicago. There are going to be alot of people made VERY friggin rich thanks to this.

Whats worse, these people with their new found fortunes will undoubtedly be protected by tax loop holes written into law by other greedy [millionaire] politicians over the years.

If you want some of the facts, check out Michelle Malkin [hotair.com]. She has it all categorized very nicely.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 6 months ago

Everyone here has glossed over something here. Obama is going to have to boast the USA to get this to happen. This might be the FIRST time he will have to complement us rather than apologize for for us...

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Good Ole Boy (Independent) - 6 months ago

Reply to RN2009
Iran is letting the weapons inspectors in, thanks to negotiations. Would you prefer we antagonize th … Show full comment

Israel threatening to bomb them and the hint we might got them to the table. We are yet to see if it does any good, so far real progress doesn't look likely with Irans recent comments.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ironhead (Libertarian) - 6 months ago

Mark Levin is a neocon tit who should be dismissed by anyone with half a brain. I don't care what your political background is (I certainly do not support Obama) - but Levin is nationalist w*nker who should be ignored.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ReaganiteGOPer (Republican) - 6 months ago

Nobody out there takes Obama seriously, you libs live in a Pollyanna dream world apparently. Nobody "respects" him overseas, he's offended all our allies, and he's kissed up to all our enemies... for no benefit whatsoever.

The sad reality is that the Russians, Iranians, Venezuelans, Chinese, and just about everybody else clearly see an opportunity for strategic and diplomatic gains.. and are moving in haste to put him back on his heels, with new threats and maneuvers reminiscent of the Cold War, in the case of Russia.

They have already outwitted Barack, who was caught dozing while the Kremlin nabbed the Kyrgizstani airbase that was so vital for any potential Afghan "surge" plans.

North Korea, Iran, and Russia see his "open hand" as a sign of weakness... the same as conservatives said all-along. And the worst is yet to come-"Yes We Can" invade Ukraine... and what are you going to do about it, Barack?

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

1 - 25 / 31
Previous 1 2 Next