ChipBuffalo Constitutionalist
Littleton, Colorado US
133 news,
67 videos,
15 blog posts,
1562 comments,
1 forum posts
Recently Submitted News
ObamaCare Vote: Updates and Live Streaming Coverage Here
Reaganite - As for the whip-count, they don't yet have the votes... and with Loretta Sanchez going AWOL, it's...
Finally an honest Democrat
Youtube - This must be seen to be believed but for once someone in the Democratic party is telling...
Financial reform, what's the right way?
Politico - "The overall result of the last-minute changes is a bill that was much tougher than many on...
Sean Penn Suggests Prison Time for Journalists Who Call Hugo
Newsbusters - Sean Penn went on a rant in defense of Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez, suggesting prison time for...
Chairman Zero Picks a Fight with Israel- WHY?
Reaganite - That's a good question, especially after the way he's licked Hugo Chavez' posterior.
- 8 Comments
- Add a comment
padokc (Republican) - 5 months ago
So what is really bugging you here, that he is being called a terrorist, or being called a muslim te … Show full comment
Exactly ChipBuffalo....
Why doesn t the men from his local mosque come forward to condemn him and his actions?
Hum? I don t think he was mentally ill...After all, he was surrounded by mental health professionals .... hello...do you think they could detect mental illness?
I think he must have been radicalized by his mosque. So where is the responsibility of his mosque clerics who obviously knew his views .... don t you think he made them known to them? I have to agree with my preacher or I won't attend and listen to the sermons.
I think I heard today ... not sure if it is verified but wouldn't be surprised if it were true ... that there may be a connection of this man to the 9/11 Muslim terrorists and their mosques ... or is that not politically correct to call those 9/11 guys ... Muslim and terrorists. Shall we avoid the facts?
CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO WAR DURING MILITARY SERVICE:
"In the United States, there are two main criteria for classification as a conscientious objector. First, the objector must be opposed to war in any form, Gillette v. United States, 401 U.S. 437. Second, the objection must be sincere, Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375. That he must show that this opposition is based upon religious training and belief was no longer a criterion after cases broadened it to include non-religious moral belief, United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 and Welsh v. United States, 398 U.S. 333. COs willing to perform non-combatant military functions are classed 1-A-O by the U.S.; those unwilling to serve at all are 1-O."
Ask yourself if this man were not a Muslim do you really think we would be having all of these funerals today? There is a way to be a conscientious objector in our military .... and he probably could have had an alternative assignment .... other than active military battlefield service .... but I guess he must have wanted the violence instead and maybe the military didn't think he qualified for CO status .... so is the military being PC at the risk of our own guys?
padokc (Republican) - 5 months ago
You are completely correct- WHAT was this blatant Jihadist doing in the Army... and promoted to Majo … Show full comment
How can Obama face all of those military men and women especially those who were on their way out the door to the war theater? I can t help but put myself in their shoes and wonder why this Commander In Chief wasn t booed out of the door for his NON-POLICY that is placing the whole war effort in jeopardy...if you are to believe the commanders in the field.
Everyday Obama continues to wait to send help, he is endangering thousands of American soldiers.
Why is that not being trumpeted and the question, "What side is this administration on?" being asked with all sincerity? He is definitely a Muslim apologist....his whole administration is. I would call this religious sect anything but peaceful in intent.
Anyone who is not a Muslim is considered an infidel worthy of a trash can and death according to the Koran. Read it for yourself.
""Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loves not transgressors. And slay them wherever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter... But if they cease, God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful... If they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression" (2:190-193).
Granted there was context to these verses but Jihad is underlying in this sect and terror is justified to spread their concept of "good works" mandated in their religious laws which are hardly just.
Contrast that with this from a Jewish prophet who said, "But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust. For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more [than others]? do not even the publicans so? Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." (Matthew 5:44)
In Christianity, we know that every human being is created by God Almighty in his own image, and we as his creatures are to respect every life because it belongs to God. However, God has indeed given us permission to defend ourselves against unwarranted aggression as found in the 66 books of the Bible. It is God who is Sovereign because he is the originator of all life and is able to understand the heart and intent of every human being; therefore the right to sit in judgment belongs to God Almighty and he promises in our Bible to do just that with every life he creates.
American troops are in this war theater to put a stop to Muslim aggression on innocents, and we are clearly justified to do stop the aggressor. Our history proves our national intentions just as the Muslim records theirs.
Now which concept is really peace loving and tolerant? Who can say that the Iraq people (especially women) are not better off today than they were before the war?
ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 5 months ago
You are such a genius! You figured it out. There must be no other conclusions - a man simply must b … Show full comment
So what is really bugging you here, that he is being called a terrorist, or being called a muslim terrorist?
Is it at all possible that he started out with good intentions and became lulled into the radical islamist that terrorized Ft. Hood? I call him a terrorist because he did what he did. I consider him a muslim, because he is one, can we not put those two together because it's not PC and might enrage the muslim community?
How about calling on the muslim community to publicly condemn these acts of terror in the name of the all peaceful religion of islam?
ironhead (Libertarian) - 5 months ago
You are completely correct- WHAT was this blatant Jihadist doing in the Army... and promoted to Majo … Show full comment
You are such a genius! You figured it out. There must be no other conclusions - a man simply must be a terrorist if he is Muslim and a disturbed murderer.
I never realized that the best way to become a terrorist is to joint the military straight out of high school, become a psychiatrist, wait until you are promoted to Major and then...BAM! Take out a dozen or so soldiers who are not of any particular high-ranking or strategic importance with....hmmmm....a bomb? No, let's use a....pistol?!?
You should go join Scotland Yard, you tit.
ReaganiteGOPer (Republican) - 5 months ago
This is the worst sort of political correctness; in this case can we not say POLITICAL CORRECTNESS c … Show full comment
You are completely correct- WHAT was this blatant Jihadist doing in the Army... and promoted to Major? WTF??!!!
And I hope the soldier s families sue the crap out of the Army... and force them to get their freaking priorities straight.
Just when you thought military morale couldn t be more damaged by the Obama era- and dont' expect any solutions from him, he's a perfect example of what the whole problem is
padokc (Republican) - 5 months ago
This is the worst sort of political correctness; in this case can we not say POLITICAL CORRECTNESS contributed directly to the death of a whole lot of innocent people in Texas?
skip foss (Independent) - 5 months ago
The need to start checking all armed forces and get all of these Muslims out,I don'give a damn what propaganda they put out or how the media tries to cover for them they can not be trusted not to turn on our men and women ,this is not the first incodent of this ,but there was a sargent that killed some men and you have never heard any more about it .You do not put an enemy in your own ranks and right now is the time to get these ragheads out and those that are in this country should be put some where that they can be watched 24/7. There is no such thing as a peaceful muslim history will prove that if you go back to the time before the crusades,and read that peice of crap the Koran it tells them to kill all that they can not convert. GET THEM OUT NOW,before there great leader Barack Hussein Obama gives them the word to open season like the peice of crap in FT Hood did
ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 5 months ago
When a Christian kills an abortion doctor he/she is rightly condemned by everyone (including Christians) and the entire faith is scrutinized. When [yet] another muslim goes on a killing spree in the name of allah, the media does whatever possible to cover the muslim thing up, and the government goes into ultra sensitivity training.
Loading
1 comment
SPREAD THE WORD