Rosetteismyname Centrist
Plano, Texas US
183 news,
37 videos,
6 blog posts,
1754 comments,
37 forum posts
Recently Submitted News
Wrong Bill At The Wrong Time
Forbes - The problem is that President Obama believes in his own messianism too deeply for that.
Ron Paul: Stop the Schumer-Lindsey National ID Card
www.lewrockwell.com - The US House of Representatives passed a spending bill last week that contains provisions establishing a national...
Obama Stimulating a Marxist Revolution Using Taxpayer Money
Townhall.com - A Marxist group that has demanded the “destruction” of the U.S. and issued a call "to bring...
CAMP FEMA - Now Hiring All Positions
Youtube - As noted it will get ugly soon. They know it. People with brains know it.
PROTEST AGAINST US GOVERNMENT AND GO TO FEMA CAMPS
Youtube - It is George Bush fault. George is making OBAMA take our freedoms away
Democrats Reveal Facts About Health Care
Youtube - Hey Obama none of us sent any of you to lead. You are all there to represent.
Obama’s anti-fraud gimmick
Michelle Malkin - If he were so interested in rooting out fraud and saving taxpayers money, why the hell did...
Patriot Games
article.nationalreview.com - But let’s not forget why the Democrats are pursuing reconciliation in the first place: Obamacare necessitates a...
- 13 Comments
- Add a comment
Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 4 months ago
If that's the case then I don't see any problem, but that article didn't read that way. So long as t … Show full comment
I recall that the article added interest to interest - that is just what happens on anything financial substance that goes default....
The bank was refusing to work with them in restructuring and hassled them - the judge was sick of it - especially since they took bailout money, "specifically - The judge called the bank, "MISLEADING" - they intentionally did this of course...
Second... judges wipe debts legally owed all the time - sometimes it is called bankruptcy - Sometimes - other things happen...
Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 4 months ago
"The bombshell decision leaves Diane Yano-Horoski and her husband, Greg Horoski, owing absolute … Show full comment
You are just being obnoxious here - I never denied what the bank deserved at the trial court judgement - They've taken part in a mass theft against me, against you and Greg Horoski by accepting the bailout - HOWEVER the judge stated that he wouldn't have made this had the bank been willing to work something out - they are just too greedy INTEREST ONLY.... !
re-read my comments ...
countryplowboy 4 months ago
Ummm I'm sure you know about mortgages and I'm sure that you realize that the judge did not get rid … Show full comment
If that's the case then I don't see any problem, but that article didn't read that way. So long as the bank did something illegal, for example added interest to interest, to get that astronomical interest I see no wrong in wiping away something not legally owed to them.But if it was legally owed to them then that judge was most certainly in the wrong.
ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 4 months ago
Mrs. president said this, "Ummm I'm sure you know about mortgages and I'm sure that you realize … Show full comment
"The bombshell decision leaves Diane Yano-Horoski and her husband, Greg Horoski, owing absolutely no money on their ranch house in East Patchogue." - from article.
"It erased up to $291,000 in principal and $235,000 in interest and penalties." - from article
Sorry, I guess I don t follow your point from reading the article you posted.
I stand with my original point...
Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 4 months ago
So, this man got into a situation where he could not afford to pay his bills any more. The bank trie … Show full comment
Mrs. president said this, "Ummm I'm sure you know about mortgages and I'm sure that you realize that the judge did not get rid of the original loan. He wiped out the ridiculous debt that was incurred as a result of them refinancing for a bigger loan, ie. home equity loan. they still owe the 292K that they received as a result of the refinance."
Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 4 months ago
Make them restructure and reduce interest? Sure. Wipe away money owed to them? No. If you get a loan … Show full comment
He didn't just go to the judge to have him erase the debt - The JUDGE took action - he didn't even ask for it - If he had, it is called BANKRUPTCY - duh!!!
Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 4 months ago
Make them restructure and reduce interest? Sure. Wipe away money owed to them? No. If you get a loan … Show full comment
they tried to make them restructure - the bank just was too greedy and didn't want to do it.
Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 4 months ago
So, this man got into a situation where he could not afford to pay his bills any more. The bank trie … Show full comment
He had health issues - He didn't just get into a situation - He is MS at least or a Phd in English - Someone got terminally ill -
They had an ARM - The interest rate skyrocketed - top that - they were paying interest only! Terminally ill - ARM, with a rising interest rate, etc
They tried to restructure - these banks took the money and we didn't ask for anything in return - They didn't open up the credit lines, they didn't hire people, they laid them off and took our tax paying bucks to do it.
This judge was furious b/c of they the couple had been treated -
You should read the story more closely
ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 4 months ago
So, this man got into a situation where he could not afford to pay his bills any more. The bank tries to recoup their property and some judge wipes the debt free and clear?
I don't see anything about forcing the bank to restructure the mortgage, I see them handing the banks property to a guy who got in over his head.
You guys might suddenly "love" this judge, but he has just opened the door to more personal irresponsibility.
If this doesn't get reversed in the applet courts, we are looking at a pretty bad precedent.
MrsPresident 4 months ago
Make them restructure and reduce interest? Sure. Wipe away money owed to them? No. If you get a loan … Show full comment
Ummm I'm sure you know about mortgages and I'm sure that you realize that the judge did not get rid of the original loan. He wiped out the ridiculous debt that was incurred as a result of them refinancing for a bigger loan, ie. home equity loan. they still owe the 292K that they received as a result of the refinance.
countryplowboy 4 months ago
Make them restructure and reduce interest? Sure. Wipe away money owed to them? No. If you get a loan you should pay back the money, not go have a judge erase the debt.
MrsPresident 4 months ago
I just finished reading this very same article on yahoo, and I'm so loving this judge right now.
Loading
0 comments
SPREAD THE WORD