Published 1 week ago
Remington Shotguns
Solicitation Number: EDOOIG-10-000004
Agency: Department of EducationOffice: Contracts & Acquisitions ManagementLocation: Contracts (All ED Components)
Note:
There have been modifications to this notice. You are currently viewing the original synopsis. To view the most recent modification/amendment,
click here
Solicitation Number:
EDOOIG-10-000004
Notice Type:
Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
Synopsis:
Added: Mar 08, 2010 10:39 am
The U.S. Department of Education (ED) intends to purchase twenty-seven (27) REMINGTON BRAND MODEL 870 POLICE 12/14P MOD GRWC XS4 KXCS SF. RAMAC #24587 GAUGE: 12 BARREL: 14" - PARKERIZED CHOKE: MODIFIED SIGHTS: GHOST RING REAR WILSON COMBAT; FRONT - XS CONTOUR BEAD SIGHT STOCK: KNOXX REDUCE RECOIL ADJUSTABLE STOCK FORE-END: SPEEDFEED SPORT-SOLID - 14" LOP are designated as the only shotguns authorized for ED based on compatibility with ED existing shotgun inventory, certified armor and combat training and protocol, maintenance, and parts.The required date of delivery is March 22, 2010. Interested sources must submit detailed technical capabilities and any other information that demonstrates their ability to meet the requirements above, no later than March 12, 2010 at 12 PM, E.S.T. Any quotes must be submitted electronically to the attention of Holly.Le@ed.gov, Contract Specialist (Contract Operations Group), with a concurrent copy to Sherese.Lewis@ed.gov, Contracting Officer (Contract Operations Group).The following clauses are applicable to this requirement:
52-212-1 Instruction to Offerors - Commercial Items52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Items 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions - Commercial Items52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required Implementing Statutes or Executive Orders - Commercial Items
In accordance with 52.212-2, the fill-in applicable to this requirement is below:52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items. As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows: Evaluation-Commercial Items (Jan 1999) (a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: (i) Technical Capability(ii) PriceIn accordance with 52.212-5, the following clauses are applicable to this requirement:52.225-1 Buy American Act - Supplies (February 2009)52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-Central
New equipment only; no remanufactured products. No partial shipmentsOffer must be good for 30 calendar days after submission.Offerors must have current Central Contractor Registration (CCR) at the time offer is submitted. Information can be found at www.ccr.gov.This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items. The Government will award a commercial item purchase order to the offeror with the most advantageous offer to the government. All offerors must submit their best price and delivery capabilities.
Place of Delivery: U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Inspector Generalc/o: Gary Pawlak, Special Agent500 West Madison Street - Suite 1414Chicago, IL 60661
Contracting Office Address:
550 12th Street, SW, 7th FloorWashington, District of Columbia 20202
Primary Point of Contact.:
Holly Le,
Contract Specialist
Holly.Le@ed.gov
Phone: 202-245-6070
Fax: 202-245-6297
Secondary Point of Contact:
Sherese Perrin Lewis,
Contracting Officer
Sherese.Lewis@ed.gov
Phone: 202-245-6235
Fax: 202-245-6296
Published 2 weeks ago
Chris Matthews had to sit there and bit his tongue on his show. Dan Rather was on showing how compromised Obama is and how ineffective he is as a leader telling Matthews Republicans are going to attack these issues during the election. Dan Rather said Obama couldn’t sell watermelons [on the side of the road with state troopers flagging in cars.] It’s strange when Dan Rather actually hits the nail on the head. Strange and funny.Of course this was the last thing Matthews wants exposed on his show as he was quick to cut Rather off. What Rather did this weekend is confirm what we have all known all along about Obama. He is an ineffective demagogue. You have to love these moments when the a light is finally shed upon truth in the mainstream media.Why is it libs like Rather can get away with the racist connection in the statement? If this was a republican suggesting Obama sell watermelons there would be commercials of churches burning in front of Obama's watermelon stand.
I guess one of the leftist heroes just couldn't keep his racist tendencies quiet even on the hate-America first set of little chrissy matthews. Msnbc is desperately trying to rid the internet of the video from chrissy's show.
Courtesy of bungalow bill blogspot...
Published 2 weeks ago
Another article this site will not publish..............I've been focused on the Democrats, as they are by far the more significant problem right now. But Michelle Malkin's concern is justified. She asks an unusually ballsy question, even for her! heh!
And no, I’m not talking about basketballs or baseballs or golf balls. You know what I’m talking about — excuse the language, but we need to be blunt. And you know that it’s the question that will hang over the Republican Party from now until November as it tries to persuade the base — let alone the American electorate — that it can provide a real alternative to the current crop of big government corruptocrats in power in Washington.
What the GOP needs to seriously understand - and it goes for their moderates, as well - is that the base and many Americans not always a part of it, are feeling we have reached a tipping point.
We are not uncaring for the unfortunate, or otherwise disadvantaged. We simply believe that government is not and has never been the mechanism to solve most every problem that comes along. That comes from our being thinking, as well as caring people.
But with the already crushing debt, an economy not likely to improve soon that can't handle tax increases, and the exploding budgeting being advocated by today's Democrat Party, there is little, if any room for compromise without compromising the freedoms, individual and financial, to which we are entitled as Americans.
That is what the Constitution promises us. Nothing else. If it is a document meant to protect, and it is, it is intended to protect us from you, the government. It was never designed, nor originally intended to protect every citizen from every calamity in life which might befall them. That's a myth spun in liberal education mills and salons with no relevance to the Constitution at all.
That is where Michelle's question comes in. Do Republicans have the balls to stand up for the document that protects, and stands up for, us against them (read Washington, DC); or, do they only wish to be the softer advocates of the soft tyranny Washington has for too long been getting away with imposing on us?
We are the free men and women with the God given right to do and choose as we please and care for ourselves in the process. You are not free to choose to do it for us. You took an oath! You took an oath to stand up for the Constitution. It's you who is supposed to be bound by that, not us!
And if you lack the vision, the wisdom, the courage and, yes, the balls to do it now when we need it most, then go the hell home before we send you there. Because we will be doing that very thing more and more during the difficult times for America just ahead if we must.
Published 2 weeks ago
Just another story that politics.com will not post so here it is copy and pasted.........Tonight, Barack Obama will host�ten House Democrats�who voted against the health care bill in November at the White House; he's obviously trying to persuade them to switch their votes to yes. One of the ten is Jim Matheson of Utah. The White House just sent out a press release announcing that today President Obama nominated Matheson's brother Scott M. Matheson, Jr. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
“Scott Matheson is a distinguished candidate for the Tenth Circuit court,” President Obama said.� “Both his legal and academic credentials are impressive and his commitment to judicial integrity is unwavering.� I am honored to nominate this lifelong Utahn to the federal bench.”�
Scott M. Matheson, Jr.: Nominee for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Scott M. Matheson currently holds the Hugh B. Brown Presidential Endowed Chair at the S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, where he has been a member of the faculty since 1985.� He served as Dean of the Law School from 1998 to 2006.� He also taught First Amendment Law at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government from 1989 to 1990.�
While on public service leave from the University of Utah from 1993 to 1997, Matheson served as United States Attorney for the District of Utah.� In 2007, he was appointed by Governor Jon Huntsman to chair the Utah Mine Safety Commission.� He also worked as a Deputy County Attorney for Salt Lake County from 1988 to 1989.� Prior to joining the University faculty, Matheson was an associate attorney from 1981 to 1985 at Williams & Connolly LLP in Washington, D.C.
Matheson was born and raised in Utah and is a sixth generation Utahn.� He received an A.B. from Stanford University in 1975, an M.A. from Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1980.
So, Scott Matheson appears to have the credentials to be a judge, but was his nomination used to buy off his brother's vote?
Published 3 weeks ago
From the Victoria Taft blog..politics.com won't publish from her site
Baghdad Jim Mc Dermott of Washington brought the US House of Representatives to a standstill last night when other Congressmen caught wind of language he inserted into the Intelligence Authorization Act (here).Cruel, Inhumane, or torture is, in Baghdad Jim McDermott's world, making fun of the terrorist's religion:
Page 5 line 13, subsection 2
(ii) Exploiting phobias of the individual.
(iii) Using force or the threat of force to coerce an individual to desecrate the individual's religious artcles, or to blaspheme his or her religious beliefs, or to otherwise participate in acts intended to violate the individual's religious beliefs.
(iv) Making threats against any individual that, if carried out, would result in death or serious bodily injury
Let's put this in perspective, shall we? The people who for example put explosives in their shoes, underwear, and attempted to fly jumbo jets into buildings can't be teased about their religion because we're afraid we're going to HURT THEIR FEELINGS?Is this an attempt to bring hate crimes legislation into the milieu of CIA spooks trying to find out where the next Jumbo Jet explosion is going to be?Of course it is.Here's the Congressman who couldn't bring himself to include the words, "under God," in the Pledge of Allegiance and
he's worried we'll offend
terrorists'religion?The 'phobia' portion of his definition of torture or cruel inhumane treatment pertains to an incident in which interrogators considered putting a CATERPILLAR in the room with a terrorist BUT DIDN'T! Really, Jim? Who's side are you on, anyway?
The left wonders why it gets no respect in regard to their handling of terror or crime. They coddle these people and want the right in the country killed. The left is our biggest threat and America's number one enemy.
Published 3 months ago
Another article the cowards at Politics will not post.You should be so very proud.Copied from Lanny davis's blog article and pasted here thanks to left-wing scum on the site payroll. If you try to post something from americasucks.net it will be on the front page before you hit the publish button.
By: Lanny Davis
Let me get this straight: For 60 years, since Harry Truman, liberal Democrats have supported a national health insurance system — so that the health of individual Americans and families would not be a function of wealth. Now, in December 2009, we Democrats have a progressive president and substantial majorities in both houses of Congress and finally have a chance to get to 60 votes, and perhaps more, in the Senate with legislation that would:1) Guarantee access to private insurance policies for virtually every American (at least, well above 90 percent), including providing tax subsidies to about 30 million people who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid and too little to be able to afford to purchase health insurance.2) By virtually requiring everyone to “pay or play” — thus broadening the base of the insurance pool to include the young and healthy as well as the old and infirm — require every insurance company to provide health insurance coverage, regardless of the health or status of the applicant, regardless of pre-existing condition, regardless of a chronic disease, and regardless of age or infirmity. 3) Provide a transparent state-regulated public marketplace, where insurance companies would have to sell their insurance and allow consumers to compare prices and encourage competing companies to sharpen their pencils in order to increase their sales.4) Do all of this and still reduce the deficit after 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. And yet, people who call themselves liberals or progressives are calling for the bill to be defeated, for President Barack Obama to be opposed?Is there anyone among them who is uninsured who would oppose this bill? People who depend on public hospital emergency rooms for healthcare when one of their children is sick? People who are unemployed with a pre-existing condition, who lost insurance and can’t get any company to cover their families? People who are scared to death that, without health insurance, they are one serious illness away, for themselves or their families, from bankruptcy and ruin? I doubt it. President Obama and his brilliant and politically savvy chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, began at the beginning with the following simple strategy: Let’s get the fundamentals passed — and the above four components are clearly the fundamentals. Let’s try for more, including a broad public option, and push the edge of the envelope to get it all. We see the hateful, suicidal impulses of the Democratic hard left in the scapegoating of Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut. First we have vicious personal attacks on him when he expressed doubts about the new idea of a Medicare buy-in for those ages 55-64 — and hypocritical silence when, a few days later, numerous liberal Democratic senators, such as Wisconsin’s Russ Feingold, Minnesota’s Al Franken and Amy Klobuchar, and Vermont’s Patrick Leahy, express concerns about the proposal and its failure to provide for adequate reimbursement rates. Then we hear from the notorious Jane Hamsher — the same Hamsher who used the universally condemned racist “blackface” photo of Lieberman on her blog in 2006 when she was opposing his re-election — we hear Hamsher demanding that Lieberman’s wife, Hadassah, be fired from her position as global ambassador for the Susan G. Komen for the Cure breast cancer charity. The reason: Because Hamsher accused her of being a lobbyist who had worked for the pharmaceutical industry in years past. (Not that facts matter to Hamsher, but Mrs. Lieberman has never been a lobbyist. She worked for pharmaceutical companies years ago, companies that produce products that save people’s lives, and only someone who thinks like Joe McCarthy would deem it appropriate to attack Mrs. Lieberman — even if both were true.)It’s time for mainstream liberal Democrats to join with the party’s moderates and the great center of America — the center-left that elected Obama president and to which he has appealed consistently as president — in support of the current national health insurance bill with these four components that can win 60 votes in the Senate. And it’s time for the party’s mainstream to call out the hateful left — and affirm the values of liberalism, not the philosophy that “the good is the enemy of the perfect” and the demonization and impugning of the motives of those fellow Democrats with whom there are honest differences.
Published 3 months ago
Politics won't post the article so I will copy and paste it.It does not fit their liberal mindset and surely can't have to much truth about liberal theft released.......GOUVERNEUR, NY - The computerized voting machines used by many voters in the 23rd district had a computer virus - tainting the results, not just from those machines known to have been infected, but casting doubt on the accuracy of counts retrieved from any of the machines.
Cathleen Rogers, the Democratic Elections Commissioner in Hamilton County stated that they discovered a problem with their voting machines the week prior to the election and that the "virus" was fixed by a Technical Support representative from Dominion, the manufacturer. The Dominion/Sequoia Voting Systems representative "reprogrammed" their machines in time for them to use in the Nov. 3rd Special Election. None of the machines (from the same manufacturer) used in the other counties within the 23rd district were looked at nor were they recertified after the "reprogramming" that occurred in Hamilton County.
Republican Commissioner Judith Peck refused to speculate on whether the code that governs the counts could have been tampered with. She indicated that "as far as I know, the machine in question was not functioning properly and was repaired" by the technician.
Commissioners in other counties have stated that they were not made aware of the virus issue in Hamilton County. In Jefferson County, inspectors from four districts claim that "human error" resulted in their "mistakenly" entering 0 votes for Hoffman in several districts, resulting in Owens leading Jefferson County on election night though the recanvas of the computer counts now show that Hoffman is leading. Jefferson County has not conducted a manual paper ballot recount.
In St. Lawrence County, machines in Louisville, Waddington, Claire, and Rossie "broke" early in the voting process on election day. Republican Commissioner Deborah Pahler said that the machines kept "freezing up... like Windows does all the time," and that they experienced several paper jams as well. The voted ballots that could not be scanned were placed in an Emergency Lock Box and re-scanned later at the St. Lawrence County Board of Elections. Election officials in St. Lawrence County were given no advance knowledge of a potential virus in the system.
At least one County official thus far has raised concern that it's possible that ALL of the machines used in the NY-23 election had the 'virus' but only a few malfunctioned as a result. The counts from any district that used the ImageCast machines are suspect due to "the virus" discovered in Hamilton County, last-minute "reprogramming" by Dominion workers, and security flaws in the systems themselves. A manual paper-ballot recount of the vote could resolve computer vote accuracy questions.
Frank Hoar, an attorney for the Democratic Party, initially ordered the impound of malfunctioning machines but released the order on Nov. 5th so that Bill Owens could be sworn in to Congress in time to vote on the House Health bill on November 7th. Pahler said that once the impound order was released they opened the locked ballot box and had the ballots scanned. Pahler also stated that after they were able to get data from the malfunctioning machines, they did a hand-count of the ballots as well to ensure that the counts matched. Even though not required to, both commissioners in St. Lawrence County agreed that the manual count was necessary due to the malfunctions.
The machines themselves are languishing at the St. Lawrence County Board of Elections until after the election results have been certified to the state on November 28th, 2009. Pahler indicated that they have not yet been able to examine the machines to determine why they malfunctioned. A qualified technician would be able to verify the presence of a virus in the computers, but, other than the infected machines, no security precautions were taken to ensure chain of custody on the remaining computerized voting machines utilized in the 23rd district.
Doug Hoffman, the Conservative candidate in this election says that he was forced to concede after having been given erroneous election results on Nov. 3rd, in particular from Oswego County. Oswego County's election night results were off by over 1,000 votes. Hoffman claims that the "chaos" on which Oswego County chairs blame the errors and "inspectors who read numbers incorrectly when phoning in results... sounds like a tactic right from the ACORN playbook."
Some County Election officials are stating that the errors, referred to by Hoffman, are standard election-night chaos and not the result of conspiracy or tampering. Whether the erroneous results are computer error, or tampering, significant doubt now exists with regard to the accuracy of the vote counts from November 3rd.
Hoffman is raising funds for a possible legal challenge to the results and requesting that the Boards of Election hand-count every vote. On Tuesday, he "unconceded" the race. In light of the current concerns over the accuracy of the machine-counted votes, Hoffman may now have a legitimate reason to contest the election results.
Of further note, the models of ImageCast machines used in the districts have a slot through which the paper ballot is deposited into a secure holding tank underneath the machine after the ballot is scanned by the machine. The problem is that the slot is readily accessible to the voter (or poll worker) to stuff manually. 10 voted ballots could be deposited in the slot for every one voter... and if the electronic count was compromised, the "paper backup" would be useless.
The ImageCast machines have one more significant and scary flaw: USB ports. USB ports allow various devices to be attached to a computer in order to input information, connect a device, add wireless network capability and so on. Wireless network devices and USB storage devices can (and are) made small enough to fit into a regular wristwatch or bracelet.
Through either type of device, software hacks or remote control of the voting machine could be implemented or a virus introduced. Since standard count audits are only done on 3% of the machines unless there is a malfunction, a functional hack or software change could adjust election counts with the County or State Boards of Election none the wiser.
The paper ballots have not been counted by the County Boards of Elections except in the 4 districts where the known computer malfunctions occurred. The remaining districts performed a mandatory 3% spot check of the computer results but have not manually counted the remainder of the paper ballots and do not intend to.
The paper ballots themselves are another issue of concern to many voters. Unlike the traditional pull-lever voting machine that tallies its votes mechanically, the ballots used by the scanning system exist as a voted ballot after the fact. New York State law currently has no provision for those ballots to remain in public view to assure voters that they have not been tampered with.
Privacy concerns exist in many districts as well. State guidelines say that the voter is supposed to be issued a privacy sleeve to cover the ballot so that no one may see the voted ballot and thus how a voter voted. The state also suggests a large booth that allows the voter to fill out the ballot in privacy but many voters complained that the district they voted in offered no privacy sleeve and that the area they were supposed to complete the ballot in was not private.
Erik Dunk, a Jefferson County resident, voted in Henderson, NY. He said that the process was very nervewracking and that his voted ballot was not only in plain view after he completed it but that the workers took the ballot from him and fed it into the ImageCast machine themselves - removing what little privacy remained in the voting process and casting even more doubt on the security of the process.
Despite continued assurances from the manufacturer that the system is unhackable, reliable, easy to use, private, and secure; a stream of lawsuits, allegations of voter fraud, and machine failures against Sequoia from other congressional districts continue to contradict their statements.
The manufacturer of the machines, Dominion/Sequoia Voting Systems is the same company that Dan Rather accused of causing over 50,000 votes to go uncounted in the 2000 Presidential Election in Florida due to intentional oversight. Rather's report claimed that Sequoia was well aware of the issues but proceeded into the election utilizing an inferior product and told election workers and technicians to "ignore the problems.
New York election officials are in a corner. While there is significant evidence of malfunction with the new voting machines that were in use in the 23rd District and the accuracy of the recorded votes, the State had no choice but to use them. A Federal Court order demanded that New York have the machines in place and use them or be found in violation of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 which requires that all polling locations have handicapped-accessible voting machines with a variety of options available so that anyone may use the machine to vote.
Published 4 months ago
Compliments of Victoria Taft:
They told me if I voted for McCain/Palin, the Vice-President would be a moron.They told me if I voted for McCain/Palin, the nation’s hope would deteriorate.They told me if I voted for McCain/Palin, that the economy would get worse.They told me if I voted for McCain/Palin, we would see more “crooks” in high-ranking positions in Federal government.They told me if I voted for McCain/Palin, we would see more “Pork at the trough” in Federal government.They told me if I voted for McCain/Palin, we would see more deficit spending in Washington D.C.I didn’t listen. I went ahead and voted for McCain/Palin and every single prediction I was warned about came true.
Published 5 months ago
HERE’S THE TEST 1. In 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by: a. Superman b.Jay Leno c.Harry Potter d. A Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40
2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by : a. Olga Corbett b. Sitting Bull c. Arnold Schwarzenegger d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
3. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by: a. Lost Norwegians b. Elvis c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women d . Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
4. During the 1980’s a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by: a. John Dillinger b. The King of Sweden c. The Boy Scouts d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
5. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by: a. A pizza delivery boy b. Pee Wee Herman c. Geraldo Rivera d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
6. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchairby: a. The Smurfs b. Davey Jones c. The Little Mermaid d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
7. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens , and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by: a. Captain Kidd b. Charles Lindberg c. Mother Teresa d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
8. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by: a. Scooby Doo b. The Tooth Fairy c. The Sundance Kid d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
9. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by: a. Richard Simmons b. Grandma Moses c. Michael Jordan d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
10. In 1998, the US embassiesin Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by: a. Mr. Rogers b. Hillary Clinton, to distract attention from Wild Bill’s women problems c. The World Wrestling Federation d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
11. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by: a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd b. The Supreme Court of Florida c. Mr. Bean d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
12. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against: a. Enron b. The Lutheran Church c. The NFL d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
13. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by: a. Bonnie and Clyde b. Captain Kangaroo c. Billy Graham d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
Do YOU see a pattern here? NAHHHH!
Published 5 months ago
This is a simple copy and paste from gateway, beings,the politics team will not publish it.I guess they really don't want anyone to see the hatefilled rage and vile of the left and cnn.This is what is allowed on air on the liberal media.I can almost guarantee there is not one single liberal that will take exception to this or have one once of cred to call for this hate-filled scank to be fired and run out of media completely.
State-Run Media Now Openly Jokes About Murdering ConservativesIt is now acceptable for the state-run media to joke about killing conservative leaders, including Former President Bush.It’s funny.
Gore Vidal is upset that he didn’t murder President Bush.
“That’s one murder I regret not committing.”
Joy Behar agrees, “It’s too late anyway.” link for video and full story below:
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/10/gore-vidal-admits-he-wanted-to-murder-bush-joy-behar-agrees-video/Comments (13)
1 - 10 / 14
Previous 1 2 Next
Loading
US Dept.Of Education Buying 27 Sawed-Off Shotguns
1 comment 
There’s no drunk like an old drunk.
Wintery KnightWhy does Joy Behar have a TV show? That doesn’t seem reasonable.
manateespiritJust what do you think would happen if I said it was okay if to murder liberals and a cohost of a television program agreed?….
Do you think I might be maginalized? Do you think the MSM would make my life not worth living? Soooo….why is it any different when the word “conservatives” instead of “liberals” is inserted in the first sentence?
I guess I have to go with a comment on the bumpersticker “CoExist”…I guess you can coexist if you are not a conservative. Or a Christian.
BarbaraStunning! The arrogance of the elites as they look down upon the little people. As the old saying goes, Give ‘em enough rope and they’ll hang themselves.
I do think that’s begun. . .
JanetWhat a sad, hate filled old man. Why would anyone value his opinion?
Tweets that mention Gateway Pundit -- Topsy.comOctober 29th, 2009 | 7:32 pm | #6[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by conservatweet, Paul Alyunov. Paul Alyunov said: Gore Vidal Admits He Wanted to Murder Bush– Joy Behar Agrees (Video): The Mainstreaming of Murdering Cons..http://bit.ly/20JKyL [...]
non_dhimmieWith the shots fired at Lou Dobb’s family this is exactly what Nancy Pelosi warned us all about.
Violence against conservatives.
Milken’s killer was a democrat…Milken was a republican. She is sooooooo insightful.
HypogeanWilliam F. Buckley knew how to deal with this miserable, bitter, alcoholic pile of crap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYymnxoQnf8
EriahI love the ticker at the bottom of the screen“want to be friends with joy? go to facebook.com/joybeharHLN”
Let’s attack Joy on her facebook page just like the left rallied to attack Sarah Palin’s facebook page.
Harry SchellI will even more relish the chance I had in 1980 (?) to mouth off to a Vidal for President babe in Los Angeles, with her mentor just feet away, that “I wouldn’t be caught dead voting for an idiot of his inferior caliber. Piss off, will you?”.
If the big Gore has any balls, he can certainly call W and ask for a duel. Ditto Behar (a gelding, but…) You want to be something other than a dithering talker and coward, that path is clear. You can walk the talk or insert your bravery firmly into the same cavity where your head spends most of its time.
Mike WThe left is totally coming apart. Lou Dobbs whose sinking faster then obama is whining someone supposedly took a shot at him. The farther they sink the more outrageous and despicable will their claims be.
LizVidal recently called Polanski’s 13 year old victim a ‘Young Hooker’
Vidal claimed he didn’t “give a f—” about the Polanski case. “Look, am I going to sit and weep every time a young hooker feels as though she’s been taken advantage of?”
http://www.cultureandmediainstitute.org/articles/2009/20091028153428.aspx
Vidal needs to be committed.
wanumbaLet’s attack Joy on her facebook page just like the left rallied to attack Sarah Palin’s facebook page………………………….No. Let’s ignore her. Not only is it Biblically correct, “Have nothing to do with them,” ironicallly, in her chosen business, no viewers, no comentators … no ratings … no show.