Loading Loading
Just for optimization

Politics.compolls

freecreditcheck.com |  creditreports.com |  whois.domaintools.com |  bookclub.com
Frontpage Do you agree with President Obama that the US has a moral responsibility to lead global efforts to rid the world of nuclear arms?

Do you agree with President Obama that the US has a moral responsibility to lead global efforts to rid the world of nuclear arms?

Submitted by PoliticsTeam | 8 months ago
Loading Loading
Yes
31%
11 votes
No
48%
17 votes
I don't know
8%
3 votes
Maybe, see my comment
11%
4 votes

TOTAL: 35 votes - Expired 8 months ago

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 8 months ago

Well Obama should lead by example if he believes that

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

politikjoe 8 months ago

There is nothing wrong with riding the world of nukes, or of downsizing the nuclear arsenal internationally... but the US certainly has no moral obligation to make it happen or to lead the way. No more than any other powerful nation that is.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Hunny0 8 months ago

Show full conversation (2 messages)
Reply to politikjoe
There is nothing wrong with riding the world of nukes, or of downsizing the nuclear arsenal internat … Show full comment

Hunny, your right the US has no obligation to rid the world of nukes.
What do you want to do, to sit back and watch them blow up others? You do know, they'd nuke our allies first, dont you?

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

MrsPresident (Democratic) - 8 months ago

Until the world can truly be at peace with each other and people start seeing each other for what we are, people (not black, white, hispanic, asian, muslim, jewish, hindu, indian, etc), then no I don't think there is a need to give up nuclear arms nor tell anyone else they should do so too.

I'd rather that we can protect ourselves in the event of WWIII instead of being sitting ducks.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

countryplowboy 8 months ago

Nuclear weapons will be around until something makes them obsolete, until then no one is going to give them up.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Theoneandonly (Independent) - 8 months ago

Show full conversation (3 messages)
Reply to MrsPresident
Until the world can truly be at peace with each other and people start seeing each other for what we … Show full comment

I'm sorry but people will never feel that way about one another, ever.
Humans by race are vindictive, spiteful, cruel, and in need of a serious emotional and physocological awakening. They will always find someone/thing to hate
Nuclear arms will stay as long as the human race stays.... or until the next great superweapon becomes availible.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Theoneandonly (Independent) - 8 months ago

Show full conversation (4 messages)
Reply to Rosetteismyname
Well Obama should lead by example if he believes that

I agree Obama should follow through if that is what he believes in.
Therein lies the problem, it is not only about what he wants or believes, it is the decision of the populace.
Obama would have to let the masses decide,
he can do nothing without the consent of the American people, we all know this... soooo let your voices be heard I guess

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 8 months ago

Show full conversation (4 messages)
Reply to Theoneandonly
I agree Obama should follow through if that is what he believes in. Therein lies the problem, it is … Show full comment

You said, "Obama would have to let the masses decide"

Obama doesn't have to let the masses decide because it wasn't on his platform...HOWEVER - it was on the platform of some of the third party candidates that the masses could decide on each devisive issue.-

the masses made their decison in a dictatorship....

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Rosetteismyname (Centrist) - 8 months ago

Show full conversation (4 messages)
Reply to Theoneandonly
I agree Obama should follow through if that is what he believes in. Therein lies the problem, it is … Show full comment

No, it isn't the decision of the populace. He never offered that. It is his job - the delirious people voted for him along with the ill-informed or uninformed voters.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Be Smart (Democratic) - 8 months ago

the poll didn't count my vote!

I am maybe, see my comment

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Unity 8 months ago

I am all for the elimination of nuclear weapons.... but I am also realistic enough to know I won't see it in my lifetime.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Stanley Jasper (Independent) - 8 months ago

Show full conversation (2 messages)
Reply to Unity
I am all for the elimination of nuclear weapons.... but I am also realistic enough to know I won't s … Show full comment

Ditto. Ain't going to happen in my life time either. And I'm 2! Ok...47. Don't get me wrong, I'm an Obie guy...but I'm sick and tired of hearing "statesmen" make these hollow lame a*s statements. Snooze fest. Heard it all before...

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

ChipBuffalo (Constitutionalist) - 8 months ago

Show full conversation (3 messages)
Reply to MrsPresident
Until the world can truly be at peace with each other and people start seeing each other for what we … Show full comment

Wow, I agree, for the most part, but I do think that the WORLD community needs to block certain regimes from "Nuking Up". I think that N. Korea, Iran, Venezuela, etc. should not be permitted to have nuclear weapons.

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

JenniferBarrier (Independent) - 8 months ago

I agree with ChipBuffalo!

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

Lex Lowther 8 months ago

Like it or not mutually assured destruction has worked so far as a deterrent. We had better have a weapon that tops the nuke before ever trying that one.

LEX

Sorry

or Register to add your comment.
It will take only a few seconds, we promise!

1 - 15 / 15