That military aid was voted by the Congress. So it clearly was not Trump who was offering it. You need to offer or receive something in cash.
Jacob’s Law Dictionary is clear: "taken largely it signifies the Receiving, or Offering, any undue Reward, to or by any Person concerned in the Administration of publick [sic] Justice.”
In Trump’s case, only receiving some undue reward would be sanctioned (and they never started the investigation). Not offering, because he was not offering anything-he was withholding.
Nothing new, we have already heard it:
Trump supporters are happy saying he just did not do what he is accused of. Nothing else is needed.
Really? If only you had one ounce of bipartisanship in your body, you would have understood that Jordan and Stefanik, in the first place, ripped these Democratic witnesses apart.
Prince Andrew only dug himself even deeper. His elder daughter might even be called to testify, and that is obviously him on the photo with that Virginia who is accusing him of sexually abusing her when she was a teenager.
It is obvious…that woman is a joke. She is sending mixed signals because she is trying to assess what is best for her political career…and it seems that it is changing day by day. She is offering herself (politically) to whoever gives her more money. Pathetic and sad.
He did not say that in an interview, but he tweeted, like he always does. Nothing new. He was just explaining why he had to remove her. She was not efficient.
Only that he did not fire a weapon and did not try to kill anyone. He just had a conversation about corruption in Ukraine, because he wanted to know who our aid was going to.
Trevor Noah thinks he is funny? What is wrong about what Fox News said? Jim Jordan and Stefanek destroyed Democratic witnesses, and Schiff was dazzled. Nothing new came to our attention.
He said that Trump was overheard by a member of his staff…and you call it a first hand knowledge?
It is completely out of order to equate Ivanka with Hunter when it comes to Ukraine dealings. No grounds for calling her to testify-at all.
What are you trying to say? She is defending the President, and, at the same time, being against him? Not sure I understand.
Of course we do not. Trump has rescued our economy and that is the reason why he will be re-elected.
This PC language is taking it over the top. Autism is unfortunately an illness, and not any sort of identity or one’s right to exercise the freedom of choice.