Was Hunter Biden corrupt? Yes? Was he undeserving of his position? Yes? So what is the problem now if Trump wants to investigate his role and expose his corruption? If you are fine with Ukraine doing the same?
Of course you cannot expect Ukraine investigation from the deep state. They are trying to hush it up.
But read this: https://www.thenation.com/article/ukraine-elections-2016/
"The prospect of Mr Trump, who has praised Ukraine’s arch-enemy Vladimir Putin, becoming leader of the country’s biggest ally,” it began, “has spurred not just Mr Leshchenko but Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a US election.”
Then who is it about? Was not it the whistleblower who started this whole story?
Schiff is so…well, if I may say so, stupid? That man was a prosecutor? Jordan was simply asking about the identity of the 4th person Vindman was talking to…and Schiff jumped from his chair: You are not allowed to ask questions about the whistleblower! He basically outed him.
He was using dirty words?
On a more serious note…I sometimes wonder what all these people are talking about. Have not we all read the transcript? Yes? Then, in all honest, what do I find improper about that call? Zelensky was the first who brought up the subject of investigations!
Well, I think they explained…they said they were afraid of not being able to get interviews from Will and Kate because of Prince Andrew.
This explanation does not satisfy intelligent people? Well…what can we do.
Have you listen to this interview at all? The journalist was all over Scalise, did not allow him to speak. Fox News is not CNN.
Well, he is spot on, especially about javelin missiles that were sent to Ukraine. Do you think he would have done it if he wanted to withhold the aid? The key question here is: Did money go to Ukraine? Yes it did! So what is the problem?
So much of this shambolic, so called,
impeachment investigation is based
on hearsay, and Schiff’s ‘interpretation’.
You are asking that question because you are used to partisanship in the media, probably because you are watching CNN. It escapes you that the media can also be objective-and should be! That is what Fox News is. That is what CNN is not.
And then they say that Fox News is under Trump’s control? Can you hear something like this, against Democrats, on CNN? Of course not!
And this Kennedy thought she was funny. She is auditioning for a job on CNN or what? Wants to join Shep?
What did you expect? An applause? For what? Another one who was destroyed by Stefanik. She really said that she did not suspect Trump of doing anything criminal. So where is Tucker wrong?
So what? Kavanaugh was being wrongly accused of being a sex-abuser by a renowned liar, so it is normal that he was emotional. Yovanovitch was testifying against Trump.
Yovanovich, was a complete waste of space
appearing at this pointless enquiry.
As Manuel…of Fawlty Towers fame used to
say, ‘I know nothing’.
The most important part is missing from this “analysis”.
Have you read the transcript? Why do we care if some Vindman felt that “something was wrong” with that phone call? Do you have your own eyes and brain? Who was the first person who brought up aid and potential investigation? Was it Trump or Zelensky?