Whilst the ‘land of milk and honey’ magnet
is available to migrants, of course these
people will look for the country with
the most attractive financial potential.
I get that, but wouldn’t the prospective
Governments who are under the most
financial pressure from migration costs,
be better served contributing to the
infrastructures of the migrants home
Nation?
Interesting piece, especially the Denmark
stats.
Welfare is the prime magnet for many
migrants, in attaining a better life.
In the U.K, up to 80 percent of
migrants, with multiple family
are benefiting from, and putting
a huge strain on the welfare
system. Free healthcare and housing
also boosts the costs.
Boris Johnson is pushing for a policy,
whereas, migrants will only be eligible
for ‘benefits’ after 5 years, which would
be a more sensible option.
Whilst the ‘land of milk and honey’ magnet
is available to migrants, of course these
people will look for the country with
the most attractive financial potential.
I get that, but wouldn’t the prospective
Governments who are under the most
financial pressure from migration costs,
be better served contributing to the
infrastructures of the migrants home
Nation?
Interesting piece, especially the Denmark
stats.
Welfare is the prime magnet for many
migrants, in attaining a better life.
In the U.K, up to 80 percent of
migrants, with multiple family
are benefiting from, and putting
a huge strain on the welfare
system. Free healthcare and housing
also boosts the costs.
Boris Johnson is pushing for a policy,
whereas, migrants will only be eligible
for ‘benefits’ after 5 years, which would
be a more sensible option.