Politics expressed through video. A place to share videos that have political relevance.
The fact that Vindman talks about “an alternative false narrative” (Ukraine involvement in the 2016 election, which is still being investigated) shows how “objective” and bipartisan he is.
Ukraine investigation? Really? I was only aware of Mueller probe into Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election. Ukraine investigation, I’m afraid, exists only in Trump’s head.
Of course you cannot expect Ukraine investigation from the deep state. They are trying to hush it up.
But read this: https://www.thenation.com/article/ukraine-elections-2016/
"The prospect of Mr Trump, who has praised Ukraine’s arch-enemy Vladimir Putin, becoming leader of the country’s biggest ally,” it began, “has spurred not just Mr Leshchenko but Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a US election.”
Was Manafort corrupt? Yes? Was he Trump’s head of campaign? Yes? So what is the problem now?
Was Hunter Biden corrupt? Yes? Was he undeserving of his position? Yes? So what is the problem now if Trump wants to investigate his role and expose his corruption? If you are fine with Ukraine doing the same?